Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.90 seconds)
Documents citing Mathew P. Thomas vs Kerala State Civil Supplies ... on 11 January, 2000

National Small Industries Corporation ... vs Narayanan on 24 May, 2005

The Supreme Court in Mathew P. Thomas v. Kerala State Civil, Supplies Corporation Ltd. and Ors. (2003 (1) KLT 874 (SC) : (2003) 3 SCC 26) held that repeated dereliction of duty will tantamount to unsatisfactory performance. Even though serious allegations of misconduct and of unsatisfactory service were contained in the show cause notice, order of termination was solely based on unsatisfactory performance in terms of the conditions in the appointment order and it was held that the order of termination is an order simpliciter and judicial review is not possible.
Kerala High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - J B Koshy - Full Document

Pinaki Ghosh vs International Airports Authority Of ... on 28 August, 2006

In Mathew P. Thomas v. Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd , the court was called upon to consider the legality of an order of termination that contained certain allegations; the High Court had permitted withdrawal of those allegations, and after considering the overall circumstances of the case, concluded that the order was not punitive, but a bona fide exercise of power. The court had summarized the law on the subject, in the following manner:
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 5 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Sh. M.L. Arora vs National Institute Of Immunology And ... on 27 March, 2006

19. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the Petitioner was never a confirmed to the post; as per clause 2 of the appointment letter, an express order or letter confirming the petitioner to the services had to be issued. He placed reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court reported as High Court of M.P. through Registrar and Ors. v. Satya Narayan Jhavar ; Krishnadevaraya Education Trust v. L.A. Balakrishna ; Mathew P. Thomas v. Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation 2003 (3) SC 263 and Registrar, High Curt of Gujarat v. C.G. Sharma to say that there is no question of any deemed confirmation as was contended on behalf of the Petitioner.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Anoop. M vs M/S. Hindustan Latex Ltd on 14 February, 2011

Accordingly his service stood terminated with effect from 12.12.1998 on close of the period of probation. The termination of the service of the applicant was in accordance with clause -3 of the appointment order. The order of termination was solely based on unsatisfactory performance in terms of the conditions of the appointment order. Therefore, the order of termination of his service is an order simplicitor and judicial review is not possible as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mathew P. Thomas Vs. Civil Supplies Corporation - 2003(1) KLT 874 SC. Before terminating the service of the probationer for unsatisfactory performance no notice of hearing need be issued. The period of probation is intended to assess the work of the probationer. If the competent authority comes to the conclusion that the probationer is unsuitable for the job, he can be discharged on account of inadequacy for the job. Termination of service on the ground of unsatisfactory performance cannot be termed punitive.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1