Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.53 seconds)

Electrosteel Castings Limited vs Uv Asset Reconstruction Company ...

21. Two further judgments, one of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reported at (2016) 6 ALT 533 (D.Ram Reddy v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd) and another of the ____________ Page 16 of 26 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ O.S.A.No.292 of 2019 Bombay High Court reported at 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 466 (Bank of Baroda v. Gopal Shriram Panda) have also been cited, as such judgments rely on the exception to the rule as recognised in Mardia Chemicals Limited to hold that in a very restricted field, a civil suit may lie.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yadav Venkatesh vs Modukuru Kiran on 7 July, 2025

8. The trial Court, vide order dated 29.12.2023 dismissed the said application on the ground that in the plaint, since the status of the property is questioned and there is allegation against the secured creditor, in the light of the judgment of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh in D.Ram Reddy Vs. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Private Limited and others 1, the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act would not at all apply and the civil Court is having jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Questioning the legality and validity of the said order, the present Revision Petition is filed.
Telangana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1