Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Harmohinder Singh vs Mangla Prasad & Ors on 27 August, 2012

Gautam S/O Sh. Ashok Kumar vs Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Ram Avtar on 3 February, 2014

47. Having suffered 85% permanent disability, petitioner will not be able to enjoy usual amenities of life. Delhi High Court in Harmohinder Singh v. Mangal Prasad & Ors MAC APP 815/2010 vide its order dated 27.08.2012 observed:­ "26. It is difficult to measure in terms of money the pain and suffering which is suffered by the claimant on account of serious injuries caused to him in a motor accident. Since the compensation is required to be paid for pain and suffering an attempt must be made to award compensation which may have some objective relation with the pain and suffering underwent by the victim of a motor accident. For this purpose, the Claims Tribunal and the Courts normally consider the nature of injury; the parts of the body where the injuries were sustained; surgeries (if any) underwent by the victim; confinement in the hospital and the duration of the treatment.
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jitender Kumar S/O Sh. Mulakraj Singh vs Mahaveer Prasad S/O Sh. Harish Chand on 1 February, 2014

41. Having suffered 80% permanent disability, petitioner will not be able to enjoy usual amenities of life. Delhi High Court in Harmohinder Singh v. Mangal Prasad & Ors MAC APP 815/2010 vide its order dated 27.08.2012 observed:­ MACT No. 1134/08 Jitender Kumar v. Mahavir Prasad 22 of 26 "26. It is difficult to measure in terms of money the pain and suffering which is suffered by the claimant on account of serious injuries caused to him in a motor accident. Since the compensation is required to be paid for pain and suffering an attempt must be made to award compensation which may have some objective relation with the pain and suffering underwent by the victim of a motor accident. For this purpose, the Claims Tribunal and the Courts normally consider the nature of injury; the parts of the body where the injuries were sustained; surgeries (if any) underwent by the victim; confinement in the hospital and the duration of the treatment.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reliance General Ins. Co.Ltd. vs Dil Bagh Singh And Ors. on 10 July, 2018

11. Regarding cost of artificial limb, I find that the Tribunal has relied upon decision of a co-ordinate Bench of this court in Harmohinder Singh (supra) to grant compensation under this head. The Injured in his appeal has led additional evidence of Anshul Sengar from Otto Bock Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., and as per this witness, the Injured was examined by a Prosthetist and Orthotist and his evidence remained unchallenged.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - S Gaur - Full Document
1