Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Gurunath Jadhav S/O Khemu vs The Commissioner Collegiate Education ... on 21 February, 2024

7. Learned High Court Government Pleader, Sri.Rajkumar A. Korwar appearing for the Government submits that the writ petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of approaching the appellate authority as per Section 130 of the Act. As per the judgment of this Court, in case of STATE OF KARNATAKA vs B. R CHOWDAPPA1 an employee of private educational institution cannot invoke the writ jurisdiction of High Court 1 ILR 2000 Kar. 4045 -9- NC: 2024:KHC-K:1721 WP No. 206064 of 2015 by filing writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. It is submitted that the writ petition itself is not maintainable. Alternatively is submitted that as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of P.SUSHEELA AND OTHERS. V/S UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND OTHERS2, the eligibility criteria of NET/SLET/SET was held to be correct and the Hon'ble Apex Court has upheld the said Regulation and also held that there is no vested right on the part of the applicants. The petitions filed by the applicants questioning the regulation issued by the UGC whereby acquiring the qualification of NET/SLET was held to be valid and all the appeals were dismissed. He submits that in the light the said order, they have rejected the case of the writ petitioner. It is submitted that there is no illegality with the impugned order passed by the respondents.
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1