In the present case, as we find that the adjudicating
authority namely Commissioner himself has held that in
regard to the issue no. (a) of Rs. 18.35 crores the
Commissioner has dropped the demand for recovering of
Cenvat credit on the similar set of facts where the
Commissioner has held under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules,
1994, the requirement is only to "the name and address of
the person receiving the taxable service" and there is no
requirement that the name and registered address of the
person receiving the taxable service are appeared on the
invoice for taking input service credit and this has been
repeatedly laid down by the various CESTAT Tribunals"