Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Periyammal vs V.Rajamani on 18 December, 2019

C.J.Charles Rajkumar vs Mrs.Rahamathunnisa (Died) on 27 February, 2026

e. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras is directed to call for a report from the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu on the following aspects (i) Total number of pending execution petitions in Chengapattu District involving execution of arbitral awards (ii) Number of 25/27 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/02/2026 05:55:47 pm ) O,A,No.1188 of 2025 such petitions which are pending for more than six months (to be listed from oldest to newest) (iii) Reasons for the delay in disposal (iv) Number of execution petitions filed after April 2025 and their current stage and number of such cases which have been disposed within six months as required by the Supreme Court in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani [reported in (2025) 9 SCC 568].
Madras High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document

Thangammal (Died) vs Mr. V. Ramasamy (Died) on 11 July, 2025

26. The learned Executing Judge shall strictly adhere to the order passed by the Supreme Court, in Periyammal v. V.Rajamani, 2025 SCC Online SC https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 02:08:22 pm ) CRP No. 680 of 2022 507 and the Circular issued by this Court in R.O.C.No.27923-A/2025/F1 dated 23.04.2025. It is imperative for the Executing Court to ensure that the Decree holder enjoys the fruits of the decree without any further delay. Therefore, the Executing Court shall do the needful and pass orders in the E.P.No.15 of 2019 in O.S.No.1828 of 1989, by 28.08.2025 and shall send a report to this Court by 29.08.2025.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thangammal (Died) vs Mr. V. Ramasamy (Died) on 11 July, 2025

26. The learned Executing Judge shall strictly adhere to the order passed by the Supreme Court, in Periyammal v. V.Rajamani, 2025 SCC Online SC 507 and the Circular issued by this Court in R.O.C.No.27923-A/2025/F1 dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:05:59 pm ) CRP No. 680 of 2022 23.04.2025. It is imperative for the Executing Court to ensure that the Decree holder enjoys the fruits of the decree without any further delay. Therefore, the Executing Court shall do the needful and pass orders in the E.P.No.15 of 2019 in O.S.No.1828 of 1989, by 28.08.2025 and shall send a report to this Court by 29.08.2025.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.Magamayee vs S.Muniyandi on 21 January, 2026

9.Further, this Court finds that the trial Court, after considering the 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/03/2026 03:11:00 pm ) CRP(MD). No.140 of 2026 pleadings and materials available on record, relied upon the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Periyammal (Dead) by LRs vs. V. Rajamani and Another and arrived at its conclusion. The application of the said judgment to the present case cannot be said to be erroneous or illegal.Therefore, this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the order impugned herein.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Muthaiah Thevar (Died), 1. Murugan, vs Chokkalingam, on 18 March, 2026

5. The execution petition shall be deferred only if the learned Additional District Judge, Srivilliputhur, before whom the appeal is pending, directs that the decree be kept in abeyance. The executing Court shall remember the directions given by the Supreme Court in Periyammal v. V.Rajamani, 2025 INSC 329, and shall ensure that the benefit of the decree is granted to the decree holder at the earliest.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Vijayakumar - Full Document
1