R. Muthukrishnan vs Indian Overseas Bank on 2 August, 2007
In that regard he would rely upon the judgement rendered in 1996 (1) LLJ 288 (S.B.B.& J & Ors. v. S.P.D.G. v. P.D.G. v. S.B.B. & J. & Ors.) He would also submit that the contention of the petitioner that the Enquiry Officer as well as the Disciplinary Authority has not gone into the minute details of each and everyone of the charges cannot be raised in this writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, since High Court cannot re-appreciate the evidence.