Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.98 seconds)
Documents citing Mohammad Zaid vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 May, 2023

Ccl R vs State Nct Of Delhi on 7 March, 2024

15. He further submits that the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Sandeep (In J.C.) v. The State NCT of Delhi (supra), is even otherwise not applicable to the facts of the present case. He submits that the JJ Act, 2000. was amended in the year 2015 and it was specifically provided that the juvenile may not be ordered to be released in case the conditions, as provided therein, are satisfied.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rohit Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2025

43. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned amicus curiae have placed strong reliance on the case of Mohammad Zaid Vs. State of U.P. and another (Cr.P.C. No.8361 of 2020) heard along with other analogous cases by the Division Bench of the Allahadbad High Court headed by Hon'ble the Chief Justice, upon reference being made by the learned Single Judge before the larger Bench. The Court had formulated questions and answered the same by holding that a child in conflict with law will have an equal and efficacious right to seek his remedy for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. like any other citizen, but with the restrictions imposed in the said provision itself. The relevant portion of para-24 of the judgment Patna High Court CR. MISC.
Patna High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivesh Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 3 January, 2024

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case of false implication. Significantly, the FIR of this case has not been lodged by any aggrieved person and the same has been lodged by a sub-inspector of police after allegedly seeing a video wherein two injured persons were shown to have been assaulted by the applicant and other co-accused persons. It is vehemently submitted that the applicant is juvenile in conflict with law and having regard to the Full Bench decision rendered by this Court in leading CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8361 of 2020 (Mohammad Zaid Vs. State of U.P. and another) dated 24.05.2023 whereby the anticipatory bail application moved on behalf of the juvenile in conflict with law was held to be maintainable. It is further vehemently submitted that general role has been assigned to all the accused persons named in the FIR as well as in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, including the two injured persons and no grievous injury has been caused to any of the injured persons and, therefore, the invocation of Section 307 IPC is in doubt. It is further vehemently submitted that the applicant is not having any criminal history and during the course of investigation he had approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.8791 of 2022 and vide order dated 28.11.2022 till the next date of listing or till submission of police report under Section 173(2) CrPC, whichever is earlier, the liberty of the applicant was protected, however, now charge-sheet has been submitted by the police and the applicant has cooperated thoroughly with the investigating officer and, it is on account of this, the charge-sheet has been filed without making any effort to apprehend the applicant.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Goge Alias Shakil Thru. His Father Raha ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 29 February, 2024

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it appears to be an admitted case that in the FIR there was no whisper regarding commission of rape and the allegations were confined only to outraging modesty of the prosecutrix. Even in her statement recorded under section 161 CrPC, the prosecutrix/victim did not allege commission of rape, however, in her statement recorded under section 164 CrPC she, for the very first time, has alleged imputation of commission of rape to the instant applicant. The charge-sheet in this case has already been submitted to the juvenile justice board. It also appears to be an admitted situation that the applicant is a juvenile as his age is claimed to be 14 years and charge-sheet in this case has also been submitted before the juvenile justice board. Having regard to the decision of the division bench of this court in leading CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8361 of 2020 (Mohammad Zaid Vs. State of U.P. and another) dated 24.05.2023, the instant anticipatory bail application moved on behalf of the juvenile applicant through his father is maintainable. There appears to be different parameters for considering the plea of grant of bail/anticipatory bail to the juvenile in conflict of law and the primary concern of the court is of the welfare of the juvenile.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Through His Mother Sohani vs State Of Haryana on 9 July, 2024

8. The petitioner is admittedly a minor. As per the allegations, he along with the co-accused had caused injuries to the complainant who is his aunt and three of these injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature. So far as the question of maintainability of the petition for grant of pre-arrest bail to the reason that the petitioner being a juvenile is concerned, this question has been answered by a Division Bench of this Court in Jatin's case (supra), as per which petition for grant of pre-arrest bail in case of a juvenile is very much maintainable. Similarly in Mohammad Zaid's case (supra) and Krishan Kumar's case (supra), it was observed that a juvenile could file a petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The co-accused had been arrested and all three of them have been extended benefit of regular bail. The weapons as well as the vehicle used at the commission of subject offence, have been recovered from them. As such, in my considered opinion, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and the petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail, subject to his joining the investigation within ten days and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer and surety bonds through his natural guardian as well as personal bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer and further subject to the condition that he shall appear before the Juvenile Justice Board/ Court on each and every date of hearing, shall not extend any threat or intimidation to the prosecution witnesses and also subject to his complying with usual terms and conditions under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. In case, he violates any term 4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 23-07-2024 16:29:28 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:087198 CRM-M-32143-2024 -5- and condition on which the benefit of pre-arrest bail has been granted to him, the prosecution would be entitled to seek cancellation of bail.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

X- Juvenile vs State Of U.P. And Another on 23 September, 2025

The present criminal revision has been filed to set and aside the judgement and order dated 03.03.2025 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Sambhal in Bail Application and order dated 03.06.2025 passed by Juvenile Judge, Sambhal at Chandausi in Criminal Appeal No.38 of 2025 (Zaid Vs State of U.P. and another) by means of which the order dated 03.03.2025 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Sambhal has been affirmed and the bail application of the revisionist has been rejected in Case Crime No. 336 of 2024, U/S 191(2), 191(3), 190, 221, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 109(1), 125, 223(b), BNS and Section 7 C.L.A. Act, Police Station Sambhal, District Sambhal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Siddharth - Full Document
1   2 Next