Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.48 seconds)

Sukumar M. Khot And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 8 February, 2007

Considering the case laws discussed and the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Padma Sundara Rao (Dead) and Ors. (supra), as understood in Fulchand Bhagwandas Gugale and Anr. (supra), it would be clear that there the period prescribed for is declaration under Section 6 cannot be extended. In the instant case, considering the facts, the subsequent declaration pursuant to this Court's remitting the matter, is clearly beyond the period prescribed.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - F I Rebello - Full Document

Shri. Uday Bhanudas Gujar vs Shri. Madan Yeshwant Diwan And Ors. on 19 December, 2025

13. The law on this issue is no longer res integra. The Supreme Court in Fulchand Bhagwandas Gugale v. State of Maharashtra (2005) 1 SCC 193 has authoritatively held that when an officer functions under a special statute, his powers are circumscribed by that statute alone. He does not act as a revenue officer under the Land Revenue Code merely because he also holds that office. Consequently, orders passed under the special statute do not automatically become amenable to appeal or revision under 7 ::: Uploaded on - 19/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2025 23:13:56 ::: wp-9384-2014 with connected.doc Sections 247 or 257 of the Land Revenue Code.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Shri. Uday Bhanudas Gujar vs Shri. Madan Yeshwant Diwan And Ors. on 19 December, 2025

13. The law on this issue is no longer res integra. The Supreme Court in Fulchand Bhagwandas Gugale v. State of Maharashtra (2005) 1 SCC 193 has authoritatively held that when an officer functions under a special statute, his powers are circumscribed by that statute alone. He does not act as a revenue officer under the Land Revenue Code merely because he also holds that office. Consequently, orders passed under the special statute do not automatically become amenable to appeal or revision under 7 ::: Uploaded on - 19/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2025 23:13:55 ::: wp-9384-2014 with connected.doc Sections 247 or 257 of the Land Revenue Code.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Baban Nivrutti Satav And Ors. vs Laxman Jijaba Satav (Decd.)By Lrs.- ... on 6 January, 2026

9. The appeal filed by the petitioners was admittedly under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The power to examine, vary, or modify a consolidation scheme is specifically governed by the provisions of the Consolidation Act. That power is conferred only on authorities designated under that Act. The Supreme Court, in Fulchand Bhagwandas Gugale v. State of Maharashtra(2005) 1 SCC 193, has clearly explained this legal position. The Court held that even if the same officer holds posts under two different statutes, the source of power matters. When an officer acts under a particular statute, he acts only within the limits of that statute. His orders are controlled by that statute alone and not by another law merely because he is a revenue officer. Therefore, an order passed by an officer while acting under one statute cannot be treated as an order under another statute so as to attract appellate or revisional powers under a different enactment. This principle directly applies to the present case.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Cosmos Quarries vs M/S Thakur Stone Quarries on 10 October, 2022

When the Court pointed out the decision of this Court in Fulchand Bhagwandas Gugale and Another vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2005) 1 SCC 193 which incidentally has also been relied by the High Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Court did not notice the presence of the words "or under any other law" in Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1