Between The vs The on 5 October, 2013
28 Ld.ARW has forcefully argued that the workladies have been terminated
on the basis of the report of the Enquiry Officer Sh.Hardam Lal whereas the
workladies could not have been terminated on the basis of report of Enquiry
Officer as Sh.Hardam Lal was not an employee and under law, he could not have
any power to hold any enquiry and in support of his contention has relied upon
various judgments titled as Hotel Kanishka vs Delhi Administration, LPA
no.40/95 of High Court of Delhi, Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs Ram Lal & ors
(2005) 2 Supreme Court Cases 638.