Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Munna Lal Rajak vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 August, 2019

Kedarnath Parasar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Pradeep Madhukar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Signature Not Verified Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Kailash Prasad Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Signature Not Verified Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Raj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee Signature Not Verified Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Arun Kumar Pandole vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Signature Not Verified Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Raj Kumar Singh Tomar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an Signature Not Verified Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Umeshchand vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Signature Not Verified Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Gautam Mukherjee vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still Signature Not Verified Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Malviya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

S. P. Singh Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2023

In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1326/2019 (Munna Lal Rajak Vs. State of M.P.& Signature Not Verified Others), in which it was held that if an employee is allowed to continue for an Signed by: TRUPTI GUNJAL Signing time: 25-01-2023 18:05:36 3 extended period by virtue of interim order, then the salary paid to the employee for the extended period cannot be recovered, this Court is of the considered opinion that even if it is held that the age of Oilfed employee is 60 years, but still the salary paid to him for his extended period of service cannot be recovered, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 Next