Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Bhismadev Taria And Anr. vs Radhakishan Agarwalla And Ors. on 24 June, 1968

All Residents Of Village vs Mohinder on 7 September, 2021

29. Reliance placed upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble High Court of Orissa in Bhismadev Taria and another versus Radhakishan Agarwalla and others, AIR 1968 Orissa 230 (V 55 C 66) by learned Senior counsel representing the appellant-defendant has no application in the case at hand because in that case Hon'ble Court held that co-sharer's suit for possession must either be for benefit of entire body of co-sharers or for possession of the plaintiff's share. However, in the case at hand, it is not in dispute that at the time of filing of the suit, defendant was not a co-sharer, rather he after having suffered decree from trial court purchased share of one of the plaintiff. Since at the time of filing of the suit, defendant was not a co-sharer in the suit property, there was otherwise no occasion, if any, for the plaintiff to file suit for possession for the benefit of entire body of co-sharers, rather at that time plaintiff filed suit for possession on behalf of all the share holders in the suit property.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Subir Kumar Mondal & Ors vs Niranjan Biswas & Ors on 17 May, 2013

Learned counsel of the petitioners has also referred a case law reported in AIR 1968 Orissa 230 (Bhismadev Taria and another vs. Radhakishan Agarwalla and others) which also laid down the power of the Court to transpose some defendants as plaintiffs under order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Said proposition of law is not disputed but the same is again of little help to the present petitioners in the backdrop of the facts of this case. Accordingly, I am of the opinion that present petitioners (some of the proforma respondents) have not come to the court in clean hands in making these applications 11 and that all three applications are liable to be dismissed.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - T K Gupta - Full Document

Om Prakash And Anr vs Jagdish And Ors on 30 August, 2018

Harbans Waraiah ;ksX; vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ la[;k&6 dh vksj ls mDr izkFkZuk i= ds tokc ,oa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr rdksZa esa ewy :i ls ;g izdV fd;k x;k fd okni= ds vfHkopuksa ds vuqlkj oknhx.k&vihykFkhZx.k o izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ds fgr fojks/kkHkklh gSaA okni= esa ewy :i ls iwoZtksa dh la;qDr lEifRr crkbZ tkdj oknhx.k }kjk fgLls dh ekax dh xbZ gS rFkk oknhx.k dh vuqefr ds vHkko esa ,oa izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 dh ekufld fLFkfr lgh ugha gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i izR;FkhZ la[;k&6 dks cspku fd;k x;k cspku 'kwU; gksuk crk;kA ,slh fLFkfr esa izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ds fo:) ftu rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij okn izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] og rF; oknhx.k ds fgrksa ds dze esa fojks/kkHkklh gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 dks vihykFkhZ&oknh ds :i esa izfrLFkkfir tkus dh fLFkfr esa okn dh fe;kn o dksVZQhl dk fcUnq Hkh vUroZfyr gSA vr% izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA 3 S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 605/2018 ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&oknh dk dFku jgk fd vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izLrqr okn esa lEiw.kZ fodz; i= dks fu"izHkkoh o 'kwU; ?kksf"kr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gS rFkk oknh ,oa izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ds iwoZt leku gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lEifRr ds cspku dks ftu vk/kkjksa ij fujLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gS] og tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij leku gSaA vr% izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tk,A mudh vksj ls vius rdZ leFkZu esa fuEu U;k; n`"VkUrksa dk voyEc fy;k x;kA 1- AIR 2005 Karnatka 84 Irapawwa Vs. Channabasawwa 2- AIR 1968 Orissa 230 Bhismadev Taria & Anr. Vs. Radhakishan lHkh i{kksa dks lquk x;kA izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ij euu fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa oknhx.k dh vksj ls lEifRr dk iwoZ ekfyd NksVhyky gksuk o NksVhyky dh lEifRr esa oknhx.k dk ikS= o ikS=h gksuk crkdj viuk fgr izdV fd;k x;k gS ,oa vfHkopuksa esa mDr fgr ds foijhr tkdj izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ds }kjk lEifRr dk cspku izR;FkhZ la[;k&6 dks fd;s tkus dk vkjksi yxk;k x;k gSA nwljh vksj futh vko';drk ds rF; ls Hkh budkjh dh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa fodz; i= dk fu"iknu izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 }kjk oknhx.k dh tkudkjh ds vHkko esa o oknhx.k ds gd o fgrksa ds foijhr fd;s tkus dk okni= esa vfHkopu gSA tokcnkok esa ;fn izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 }kjk oknhx.k dks rF; ls lgefr Hkh tkfgj dh xbZ gS] rc Hkh ewy okn esa vafdr rF;ksa ds lkFk&lkFk izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ds thfor gksus ij izR;FkhZ 4 S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 605/2018 la[;k&1 dh vksj ls fe;kn esa fodz; i= dks fujLr fd;s tkus ds ckcr fdlh izdkj dk okn v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izLrqr ugha fd;s tkus ds rF; dh jks'kuh esa] miyC/k rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] vU; rF;ksa ds ckcr xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr fofo/k izkFkZuk i= okndkj.k o fe;kn dh fojks/kkHkklh rF;kRed fLFkfr dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA tgkWa rd cgl ds nkSjku izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk iz'u gS] mDr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ls ;g U;k;ky; iw.kZ lger gS] ysfdu izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr fHkUu gksus ls izLrqr U;k; n`"VkUr orZeku ekeys esa ykxw fd;k tkuk lEHko ugha gSA ifj.kker% izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr fofo/k izkFkZuk i= la[;k&05@2018 varxZr vkns'k 1 fu;e 10¼2½ flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd muds vksj ls dk;kZy; esa izkFkZuk i= varxZr vkns'k 41 fu;e 2 ,oa vkns'k 6 fu;e 17 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA vr% ;fn mDr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;s x;s gksa rks layXu i=koyh dj] i=koyh nks lIrkg ckn lwphc) dh tkosA ¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr Fkkokuh@& Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1