citedby: 187894826

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)

Documents citing Kumarasamy vs Palaniyammal on 27 November, 2014

Rafiqua Asroph Ali vs S.Ravichandran

Accordingly, the same is followed in the judgment reported in 2015 (1) CTC 271 – [Kumarasamy and another Vs. Palaniyammal]. Accordingly, this Court holds that the findings rendered by the Lower Court is liable to be vacated and taking into consideration that on the very next day the petition has been filed, I am inclined to allow this Civil Revision Petition.

Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T.Anbalagan vs S.Rajabunisha on 28 June, 2022

5. It is true that the application in I.A.No.2 of 2021 has been filed after the final order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019, for non-compliance of the order. The learned trial Judge relied on the judgment of this Court in Kumarasamy and another Vs. Palaniyammal reported in [2015 (2) MLJ 147] and extended the time till 25.04.2022. Since the said period has been lapsed, nothing survives for adjudication in this revision petition.

Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R N Manjula - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Rafiqua Asroph Ali vs S.Ravichandran

T.Anbalagan vs S.Rajabunisha on 28 June, 2022