Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (2.00 seconds)
Documents citing Dev Raj Puri vs The Improvement Trust Batala And Others on 20 May, 2011

Chairman, Ludhiana Improvement Trust, ... vs Rajinder Singh Son Of Piara Singh on 25 September, 2013

20. In view of this judgment, the complaint filed by the complainant is within limitation. The counsel for the appellant has relied upon judgment of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court "Pawan Kumar Puri and others versus The Improvement Trust, Batala and another", 2003(3) PLR 431 that "filing of appropriate application within three years and deposit of the amount is must." In the above referred judgments, it has been held that 1975 Rules will be applicable and in the 1975 Rules, there was no requirement to move the application otherwise required amount of Rs. 1,000/- was deposited by the complainant vide receipt No. 33390 dated 6.5.1982, therefore, this judgment will not forefeit the claim of the complainant.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gurpreet Singh vs Ludhiana Improvement Trust on 16 August, 2017

Similarly, depositing the amount after 14 years and moving an application would not clothe him with the right to allotment of plot. Affidavit of Harpreet Singh is Ex.R-A on the record. He stated that applicant was allowed to deposit the amount subject to the merits of his application and availability of plots. Even High Court has held in "Pawan Kumar Puri and others Vs. The Improvement Trust Batala and others" 2003(3) RCR Civil-824 that where oustees have applied for allotment of plot after lapse of 10 years, his application is hit by delay and latches and is liable to be rejected on that score. Even if allotments of plots, as LDPs have been made to other persons, it does not mean that complainant is entitled to it as a matter of right.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1