Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)

Acit, C-6, Ludhiana vs Sh. Gurdeep Singh, Ludhiana on 26 June, 2020

was filed after show cause notice issued by her and also that consideration for the transfer of shares was partly remitted during financial year 2012- 2013, and then the balance consideration was paid in Financial Year 2013- 2014. The contention of the assessee has been that the transfer of shares is substantiated by the documentary evidence as per record of the "Registrar of Companies", who is the only authority to whom the intimation regarding the transfer of shares is required to be given and as per record of the ROC, the effective date of transfer of share is May 8, 2012 and, thus, it has been argued vehemently by the counsel of the assessee that during the relevant year i.e. F.Y. 2012-2013, Sh. Gurdeep Singh was not having beneficial shareholding holding in CCNPL to the extent of minimum 10% of shares. It has been further argued in regard to the late intimation to "Registrar of Companies", by the assessee that one can file belated return with the ROC and, if the annual return is late as in the case of assessee, then the same can be filed along with "late fee" as applicable as was done by assessee and, as such, for all intents and purposes, it is valid original annual return and has to be relied upon and is legally enforceable document in the Court of Law. The assessee has relied upon the judgment of ITAT Chandigarh Bench in the case of "Rajdeep Builders" Vs ACIT in ITA No. 666/CHD/2010, order dated 27.04.2012 and stressed that only one 'annual return' for the financial year 2012-13 was filed with the ROC and no case has been made out by the Assessing Officer and further, it was not a revised annual return. Reliance was also placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Motor and General Store as reported in 66 ITR 692.' 4.1 I have gone through the above said arguments and contentions of the Assessing Officer as per assessment order and it is observed that, though, the return intimating the sale of shares had been filed late with the ROC, but that is a documentary evidence, which, cannot be brushed aside, because the ITA No. 170-Chd-2018 Shri Gurdeep Singh, Ludhiana 8 department of ROC comes under the "Ministry of Corporate Affairs", which regulates the working of all the companies in India and this is a legally enforceable document which establishes the share holding pattern of the Company.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1