citedby: 188173

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Documents citing Chief ... vs Dipak Chand A Das on 16 September, 1998

K Krishna Rao vs M/O Railways on 23 November, 2020

III. It is also not out of place to observe that the Tribunal cannot direct respondents to fix a particular pay scale. It can only remit the matter to the respondents to consider as observed by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Chief Administrator-cum-Jt. Secy. to Govt. of India v. Dipak Chandra Das, (1999) 9 SCC 53, as under:-

Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D Bala Krishna vs M/O Defence on 26 August, 2020

c. Chief Administrator-cum-Jt. Secy. to G.O.I v. Dipak Chandra Das, (1999) 9 SCC 53 , "4. However, the Tribunal could not have directed fixing the pay scales of the respondent. On the other hand, a direction should have been issued to the authority concerned to fix a proper pay scale bearing in mind the finding recorded by the Tribunal that Divisional Accountants enjoy a higher status to that of a Senior Accountant."

Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Municipal Corporation vs Smt. Motia Devi Widow Of Late Sh. K.L. ... on 31 May, 2000

10. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand submitted that in RSA No. 1867 of 1994 titled Faridabad Complex Administration, Faridabad through its Chief Administrator v. Hari Chand and Ors., decided on 20.2.1995, learned Single Judge of this Court took the view that such employees are entitled to pension.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M L Singhal - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

K Krishna Rao vs M/O Railways on 23 November, 2020

D Bala Krishna vs M/O Defence on 26 August, 2020

Municipal Corporation vs Smt. Motia Devi Widow Of Late Sh. K.L. ... on 31 May, 2000