Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.59 seconds)

Prithipal Singh vs . The State C.R. No. 114/13 on 22 July, 2013

7 IO of the case had placed on record the receipts which bear signatures of the complainant / revisionist and were sent to CFSL and as per the expert opinion the signatures on the receipt are signatures of the complainant / revisionist. It was also admitted that by the complainant / revisionist that the receipts were signed by him in the office of accused. Further, the complainant / revisionist has not alleged any forgery. As the complainant / revisionist himself is not denying his signatures on the documents nor is he alleging any forgery on the part of the accused, remedy available to him was suit for recovery of the amount. It is also important to note that a case is pending against the complainant for stabbing the accused vide case FIR No. 407/05 U/s 326/452/506 IPC. Ld. Trial Court has also rightly pointed out that there is no plausible reason as to why complainant / revisionist remained silent for about 5/6 years if he had not received the alleged amount. Ld. Trial Court has correctly observed that the complainant / revisionist wants to keep the matter pending just to pressurize the accused for the case pending against complainant / revisionist vide FIR No. 407/05 and has rightly dismissed the 4 Prithipal Singh Vs. The State C.R. No. 114/13 protest petition of the complainant / revisionist and accepted the closure report filed by the IO. It is found that the order dated 26.02.2013, passed by Sh. Mukesh Kumar, Ld. ACMM, Saket Courts, New Delhi is well reasoned and based on thorough discussion of facts of the case and there is no ambiguity in the provisions of law or its application by Ld. Trial Court. I find no merits in the revision and impugned order does not require any interference. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. 8 The Trial Court record be sent back alongwith a copy of the order. File be consigned to record room after due compliance. Announced in the open Court on 22 day of July, 2013 nd (RAJ RANI MITTRA) Addl. Sessions Judge­03/SE Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1