Nitesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 November, 2023
3. Learned counsel for the professional Board would submit that the experts of
the subject have evaluated the answer thereafter they have issued the model
answer and accordingly the answer-sheet has been examined. He would
further submit that the procedure adopted by them is fair, transparent and
applicable to all the candidates uniformly. To substantiate his submission,
learned counsel for the respondent would refer to the judgment of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the cases of Ran Vijay Singh vs. State of U.P. reported in
2018(2) SCC 357, Uttar Pradesh PSC vs. Rahul Singh and Ors reported in
2018(7) SCC 254 and Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board vs.
Vikram Singh Rana in Writ Appeal No. 108 of 2020 decided on 06.03.2020
and Umang Gauraha vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Writ Appeal No. 165 of
2020 decided on 10.12.2020. He would further submit that this Court's power
to interference in the academic matter is very limited, in view of law laid down
by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in various judgments, thus he would pray for
dismissal of the writ petition.