Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.57 seconds)

Patel vs Director on 19 February, 2010

Thereafter the observations made by this Court in the case of Shirin S. Qureshi v. National Institute of Fashion Technology (supra) were extracted and after taking into consideration another decision of the Apex Court in case of R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala and Ors. , reported in 2004(2) SCC, 105 and more particularly the observations made at paragraph 28, it was found by this Court that the result of the petitioner can be allowed to be declared with the clarification that the petitioner shall not be treated as OBC Category in future, either for obtaining service or for any other benefits flowing from the caste certificate obtained by him, since his caste certificate has been ordered to be cancelled and the petitioner shall be treated as belonging to general category for all purpose. But in that case also, the Court did impose penalty upon the petitioner therein of Rs.20,000/- and the condition was also provided for not to use the certificate in future, leaving the liberty to the petitioner to approach before the Civil Court for appropriate declaration.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - J Patel - Full Document

Julaha (Ansari) Safiullah Jamaluddin vs State Of Gujarat And 2 Ors. on 12 March, 2008

15. In the present case also, more or less the same fact situation arises for consideration. Therefore, I find that in view of the decision of this Court in case of "Shirin S. Qureshi" (supra) upon imposition of appropriate penalty, the action of prosecuting the studies in PTC can be allowed, but upon the declaration by the petitioner that the petitioner shall not take any benefit of the reserved category until such status is conferred by the competent authority known to law and till then the petitioner shall continue to claim status as that of general category only.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - J Patel - Full Document
1