Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.78 seconds)
Documents citing Santosh Ramprasad Sharma vs Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Crime ... on 3 April, 1992

Shri Milind Hiraman Meshram vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 3 April, 2008

In this behalf, he relied on 1992 Cr.LJ 3983 Santosh Ramprasad Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner, Crime Branch, and Anr. He has further relied on the observations of this Court in Alam Ibrahim Shaikh v. S.G. Suryavansi, Dy. Commissioner of Police, Thane and Ors., and also on unreported judgment of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 10/96 Raju Mahadeorao Shende v. State of Maharashtra and Anr., wherein it was held that after service of notice, 5 months time to dispose of the proceedings i.e. for passing final orders was taken that order was held to be bad. It is further contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant that there was no satisfactory and sufficient contents appearing from show-cause notice that the witnesses were not coming forward to depose against the applicant, as such final order on that basis was illegal.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - S R Dongaonkar - Full Document

Haroon Rashid Mohammed Hussain Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 28 April, 2023

4. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that, there is no livelink in the date of show cause notice and passing of order by respondent No.2. The action is politically motivated. The gist of statements of secret witness has not been furnished. The co- accused has been acquitted of one of the offence registered against him. There is delay of four and half months in deciding the appeal. In support of his contentions. He relied on following judgments in the case of Subhash Jethu Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr, in Criminal Writ Petition No.1406 of 2011 decided on 27th August, 2012, Mr. Masiullah Mohid Idrishi Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Zone IV, Bhoivada Division Mumbai and Ors, in Criminal Writ Petition No.760 of 2010 decided on 15th July, 2010, Pandharinath Shridhar Rangnekar Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Police, State of Maharashtra, reported in 1972 ALLMR OnLine 759 (S.C), Abdul Wahab Vs. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate Malegaon And Another, reported in 1991 ALLMR ONLINE 853, Dhondiram Appa Hatkar Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 1987 ALLMR ONLINE 597, Santosh Ramprasad Sharma Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Police Crime Branch and Anr, reported in 1992 ALLMR ONLINE 821, Balu 2 ::: Uploaded on - 02/05/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 02/05/2023 23:34:20 ::: 44-wp-775-2023.doc Shivling Dombe Vs. The Divisional Magistrate, Pandharpur and Anr, reported in 1968 ALLMR ONLINE 415, Mr. Kishor Rajaram Durge Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police & Ors, reported in 2003 ALL MR (Cri) 2023, Felix Ambrosa D'Souza Vs. State of Karnataka, reported in 2003 ALL MR (Cri) 2025 (S.C.).
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Nashirkhan Yusufkhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 5 November, 2014

[5] A specific point is taken by the petitioner in this petition contending that the order of externment has been passed after lapse of more than eight months from the date of issuance of show cause notice dated 18.06.2013. Therefore, the order of externment has been passed without considering the necessity to extern the petitioner after such lapse of time and therefore, the same is without any application of mind. He has also relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Santosh Ramprasad Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another reported in 1992 (2) GLH 547 and submitted that the impugned order may be quashed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A J Desai - Full Document

Ashifkhan Yusufkhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 5 November, 2014

[5] A specific point is taken by the petitioner in this petition contending that the order of externment has been passed after lapse of more than eight months from the date of issuance of show cause notice dated 18.06.2013. Therefore, the order of externment has been passed without considering the necessity to extern the petitioner after such lapse of time and therefore, the same is without any application of mind. He has also relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Santosh Ramprasad Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another reported in 1992 (2) GLH 547 and submitted that the impugned order may be quashed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A J Desai - Full Document

Aeyazkhan Lalkhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 10 September, 2014

[5] A specific point is taken by the detenue in this petition contending that the order of externment has been passed after lapse of more than eight months from the date of issuance of show cause notice dated 18.06.2013. Therefore, the order of externment has been passed without considering the necessity to exetern the detenue after such lapse of time and therefore, the same is without any application of mind. He has also relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Santosh Ramprasad Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another reported in 1992 (2) GLH 547 and submitted that the impugned order may be quashed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A J Desai - Full Document
1