Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.35 seconds)

Tasarruf Husain (Since Deceased) ... vs Khalid Rehman & Others Page 1 Of 21 Pages on 3 June, 2020

44.In Ishwar Dutt vs Ram Piarey, 174 Raj. L. R. 302 it was held that in case of a second default in the payment of arrears of rent, even if the tenant had deposited the rent as ordered under Section 15(1) DRC Act, he would not be entitled to the benefit of Section 15 (6) and in view of the provisions of proviso to Section 14(2) DRC Act, he would be liable to be evicted.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs Ram Gopal on 8 April, 1982

The view in Manmohan Ghawla's (supra) case was applied and followed by 0m Perkash,J. in the case of Ishwar Dutt v. Ram Piarey, 1 74 Raj. L. R. 302. It was held that in the case of a second default in the payment of arrears of rent, even if the tenant had deposited the rent as ordered under Section 15(1), he was still not entitled to the benefit of Section 15(6) and, in view of the provisions of proviso to Section 14(2) he was liable to be evicted.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1