Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (3.72 seconds)

Dr. K. N. Tripathi vs Minor Tusi Roy on 26 November, 2013

In the case of Koganti Atchyuta Rao & Anr. Vs. Koganti Vineeth (supra) it has been held by the Hon'ble National Commission that the object of expeditious disposal of consumer dispute would get defeat if Court was to entertain the highly belated petitions. It has further been observed in the said case that there was no fault with District Forum having proceeded ex parte against petitioners after resorting to substituted service of notice by publication in newspapers. The Learned Counsel for the respondent has submitted that when the report of the concerned P.S. was not submitted before the Learned District Forum, a revisional application was preferred and thereafter the paper publication was made.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Paras Construction vs Paras Paradise Co-Op Housing Society ... on 20 November, 2017

10.    Learned counsel for the respondent has cited three citations namely; (i) Anshul Aggarwal vs New Okhla Industrial Development Authority - (2011) 14 Supreme Court Cases 579; decided on 09.08.2011 (ii) in Koganti Atchuta Rao and Smt Koganti Lakshmi Sridevi vs Koganti Vineeth decided on 09.04.2013 (RP no. 727 of 2013); (iii) in FA no. 1158 of 2014 - Amit Chawla vs M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd., FA no. 1156 of 2014 - Aman Grover vs M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd., and in FA no. 1157 of 2014 - Sanjay Kumar Sharma vs M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd decided on 20.11.2014 of this Commission.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1