Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Sarbdeep Singh Virk vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 16 May, 2008

Rakesh Kulshreshtha vs Union Of India on 11 October, 2011

5. As regards TA 1241/2009, both the orders of the disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority are non-speaking and non-reasoned. They are also bad for the reason of not giving show cause notice. The applicants counsel referred to Rule 31 of MTNL Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1998 (Executives) dealing with employee on deputation from the Central Government or the State Government. The reliance has also been placed on the cases of Sarbdeep Singh Virk vs. State of Punjab and others, (2008) 11 SCC 263, and Chairman, Disciplinary Authroity, Rani Lakshmi Bai Kshetriya Gramin Bank vs. Jagdish Sharan Varshney and others, JT 2009 (4) SC 519, in support of his contention that the impugned orders have not been passed by the appropriate authority, i.e., the Department of Telecommunications.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1