Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)

Smt. Deepmala Sharma & Another vs Agra Vikas Pradhikaran on 29 December, 2025

7- प्रश्नगत प्रकरण के उद्देश्यों से पीठ माननीय राष्ट्रीय आयोग द्वारा द्वारा Revision Petition No. 4516/2014 Jagannath Mutreja Vs. Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad & Anr. में इस आशय का विधि सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया गया है कि पावर ऑफ अटॉर्नी धारक, जो कब्जे में है एवं भुगतान कर रहा है, लाभार्थी उपभोक्ता है तथा उपभोक्ता परिवाद दर्ज करने का हकदार है। पीठ उपरोक्त निर्णय के प्रस्तर संख्या-6 एवं 7 का उल्लेख भी प्रासंगिक पाते हैं, जिसमें अधोलिखित उल्लेख किया गया है:-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikas Kawatra vs Universal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. on 14 June, 2024

20. It is the settled proposition of law that the Power of Attorney can file the Consumer Complaint. The proceedings under the Act are summary in nature, wherein the decision is basically/normally based on the affidavits/documents produced by the parties in support of their respective pleas. The Special Power of Attorney (Annexure-A) executed by the Complainant in favour of Sh. Raji Ahuja has been produced on record. The affidavit and certain other documents have also been produced on record, which were issued by the OPs or were exchanged between the parties. The OPs have also not denied/objected to the said documents as produced by the Complainant. Since the proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act are summary in nature, so filing of Complaint through Power of Attorney does not make much difference. The Hon'ble National Commission in the case of Jagannath Mutreja v. Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad & Anr. RP No.4516 of 2014 decided on 16.07.2015 has held that the Power of Attorney holder can file the Complaint on behalf of the Complainant. The relevant portion of said judgment is reproduced as under:
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1