Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.46 seconds)

Durga Charan Mandal vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 18 March, 2015

14. The expression "yearly sale value", as appearing in Section 109(6) of the Act ("Yearly Sale Value" is not defined in the Act), came to be considered by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Harej Ali and Another v. State of Assam and Others, reported in 2009 (2) GLT 561. The Full Bench held that "yearly sale value" of a property, put on sale through a tender system, for one year, would be the amount of money which will be received after the highest bid value of the eligible bidder, is accepted by the authority concerned. The Full Bench in the aforesaid case held that there is no provision to allow and/or permit any other authority, except the office of the Anchalik Panchayat by its President, the power to invite tenders for settlement of Hats, Ferries and Fisheries falling within its territorial jurisdiction and there is no scope to interpret that Section 109(6) of the Act gives absolute power to Zilla Parishad to invite tenders, examine and scrutinize and, then, finally to accept and approve the highest eligible bidder for the purpose of issuance of settlement order. The Full Bench also held that the procedures prescribed in sub-Rule 9(5) and sub-Rule (7) of Rule 47 of the Rules, for opening, processing and settling of the tenders, cannot vest the Zilla Parishad with the power to invite tenders and that Section 109(6) only empowers the Zilla Parishad to examine 8 and finally accept such tenders if the "yearly sale value" is more than Rs. 1 lakh. The Full Bench had laid down that after having floated a tender, if the bid value of the eligible highest bidder is less than Rs. 1 lakh, the Standing Committee of Anchalik Panchayat concerned, constituted under Section 52 of the Act, will examine and accept the tender of the highest eligible bidder and forward it to the Zilla Parishad for confirmation in terms of Section 105(4), 106(4) and 109(4) of the Act, as the case may be. However, after submission of all tender papers before the Anchalik Panchayat, if the bid value offered by the highest eligible bidder is found to be more than Rs. 1 lakh, the Standing Committee of the Anchalik Panchayat, shall immediately forward such tender papers submitted by the bidders, together with the comparative chart prepared and processed as per the procedure prescribed, to the Zilla Parishad concerned for doing the needful at their end.
Gauhati High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 8 - A K Goswami - Full Document

Azahar Uddin @ Ajahar Ali And 4 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 27 July, 2020

The learned Senior counsel for the accused-petitioners has referred to an order dated 21.05.2020 passed in B.A. No. 1008/2020 (Hanif Ali vs. State of Assam) wherein it was recorded that the injuries received by the police personnel were simple in nature. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that he has received the concerned case diary. He has submitted that the accused-petitioners have been named in the FIR and pursuant to the interim order dated 16.06.2020, the accused-petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer (I.O.) of the case and after interrogation, their statements have been duly recorded.
Gauhati High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M Choudhury - Full Document

Mahammad Ali And 4 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 27 July, 2020

The learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has referred to an order dated 21.05.2020 passed in B.A. No. 1008/2020 (Hanif Ali vs. State of Assam) wherein it was recorded that the injuries received by the police personnel were simple in nature. It is submitted by on behalf of the accused-petitioners that they are not named in the FIR. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that he has received the concerned case diary. He has submitted that the present petitioners are not named in the FIR and pursuant to the interim order dated 16.06.2020, the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer (I.O.) of the case and after interrogation, their statements have been duly recorded. The statements of the witnesses recorded by the I.O. are perused. It transpires that the Page No.# 3/3 people gathered at the place of incident had attacked the police personnel with lathi, jharu etc. and the injuries sustained by the members of the police team were simple in nature.
Gauhati High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M Choudhury - Full Document
1