Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing Shalini Khan vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 21 August, 2023

WA/361/2023 on 11 December, 2024

W.A. No.363/2023 & Ors. Page 27 As such, the Commission in respect of these two petitioners leave the matter to be decided by the Hon'ble High Court and hence the Commission have nothing to object to any decision taken by the Hon'ble High Court by considering the fact that both the writ petitioners have qualified for recommendation by the Commission on assessment of their respective merit in CCEM, 2018 and interview.' 1.4 In view of the order of the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court dated 12/3/2021 passed in WP(C) No.3341/2019 (Salini Khan Vs State of Assam & others and a bunch of writ petitions, the Commission had a threadbare discussion on the probable consequence/impact of the decision vide Minutes of the Meeting dated 30/4/2019 on its subsequent functioning in fair and transparent manner. The Commission after threadbare discussion unanimously came to a conclusion that the Commission took the decision in its minutes dated 30.4.2019 allowing 98 candidates to appear in the CCE (M), 2018 by taking the same as one off special case considering that there was no fault on the part of those 98 candidates who were declared to have qualified under the pre-revised answer keys.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document

WA/363/2023 on 11 December, 2024

W.A. No.363/2023 & Ors. Page 27 As such, the Commission in respect of these two petitioners leave the matter to be decided by the Hon'ble High Court and hence the Commission have nothing to object to any decision taken by the Hon'ble High Court by considering the fact that both the writ petitioners have qualified for recommendation by the Commission on assessment of their respective merit in CCEM, 2018 and interview.' 1.4 In view of the order of the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court dated 12/3/2021 passed in WP(C) No.3341/2019 (Salini Khan Vs State of Assam & others and a bunch of writ petitions, the Commission had a threadbare discussion on the probable consequence/impact of the decision vide Minutes of the Meeting dated 30/4/2019 on its subsequent functioning in fair and transparent manner. The Commission after threadbare discussion unanimously came to a conclusion that the Commission took the decision in its minutes dated 30.4.2019 allowing 98 candidates to appear in the CCE (M), 2018 by taking the same as one off special case considering that there was no fault on the part of those 98 candidates who were declared to have qualified under the pre-revised answer keys.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document

WA/373/2023 on 11 December, 2024

W.A. No.363/2023 & Ors. Page 27 As such, the Commission in respect of these two petitioners leave the matter to be decided by the Hon'ble High Court and hence the Commission have nothing to object to any decision taken by the Hon'ble High Court by considering the fact that both the writ petitioners have qualified for recommendation by the Commission on assessment of their respective merit in CCEM, 2018 and interview.' 1.4 In view of the order of the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court dated 12/3/2021 passed in WP(C) No.3341/2019 (Salini Khan Vs State of Assam & others and a bunch of writ petitions, the Commission had a threadbare discussion on the probable consequence/impact of the decision vide Minutes of the Meeting dated 30/4/2019 on its subsequent functioning in fair and transparent manner. The Commission after threadbare discussion unanimously came to a conclusion that the Commission took the decision in its minutes dated 30.4.2019 allowing 98 candidates to appear in the CCE (M), 2018 by taking the same as one off special case considering that there was no fault on the part of those 98 candidates who were declared to have qualified under the pre-revised answer keys.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document

WA/371/2023 on 11 December, 2024

W.A. No.363/2023 & Ors. Page 27 As such, the Commission in respect of these two petitioners leave the matter to be decided by the Hon'ble High Court and hence the Commission have nothing to object to any decision taken by the Hon'ble High Court by considering the fact that both the writ petitioners have qualified for recommendation by the Commission on assessment of their respective merit in CCEM, 2018 and interview.' 1.4 In view of the order of the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court dated 12/3/2021 passed in WP(C) No.3341/2019 (Salini Khan Vs State of Assam & others and a bunch of writ petitions, the Commission had a threadbare discussion on the probable consequence/impact of the decision vide Minutes of the Meeting dated 30/4/2019 on its subsequent functioning in fair and transparent manner. The Commission after threadbare discussion unanimously came to a conclusion that the Commission took the decision in its minutes dated 30.4.2019 allowing 98 candidates to appear in the CCE (M), 2018 by taking the same as one off special case considering that there was no fault on the part of those 98 candidates who were declared to have qualified under the pre-revised answer keys.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document

WA/364/2023 on 11 December, 2024

W.A. No.363/2023 & Ors. Page 27 As such, the Commission in respect of these two petitioners leave the matter to be decided by the Hon'ble High Court and hence the Commission have nothing to object to any decision taken by the Hon'ble High Court by considering the fact that both the writ petitioners have qualified for recommendation by the Commission on assessment of their respective merit in CCEM, 2018 and interview.' 1.4 In view of the order of the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court dated 12/3/2021 passed in WP(C) No.3341/2019 (Salini Khan Vs State of Assam & others and a bunch of writ petitions, the Commission had a threadbare discussion on the probable consequence/impact of the decision vide Minutes of the Meeting dated 30/4/2019 on its subsequent functioning in fair and transparent manner. The Commission after threadbare discussion unanimously came to a conclusion that the Commission took the decision in its minutes dated 30.4.2019 allowing 98 candidates to appear in the CCE (M), 2018 by taking the same as one off special case considering that there was no fault on the part of those 98 candidates who were declared to have qualified under the pre-revised answer keys.
Gauhati High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document
1