Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service vs Girishchandra Chimanlal Patel & on 25 February, 2014

8. The Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation (supra) was of the view that the intention of the legislature was only to grant jurisdiction to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to award damages for the loss to property. The consequential business loss could not have been assessed or awarded by the Tribunal. The loss caused due to vehicle remaining idle is not damage to the property but a loss to the owner. The court was of the opinion that the Claims Tribunals constituted under section 165 of the Act have no jurisdiction to entertain such claims.
Gujarat High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - H Devani - Full Document

Himachal Road Transport Corporation & ... vs National Insurnace Co. Ltd. & Anr. on 5 September, 2013

2. These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner/complainant against the order dated 1.4.2008 passed by the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla (in short, the State Commission) in Appeal Nos. 113, 114 & 220 of 2008 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation by which, while allowing appeal, order of District Forum allowing complaint was set aside.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Himachal Road Transport Corporation vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. on 5 September, 2013

2. These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner/complainant against the order dated 1.4.2008 passed by the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla (in short, the State Commission) in Appeal Nos. 113, 114 & 220 of 2008 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation by which, while allowing appeal, order of District Forum allowing complaint was set aside.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1