Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)

Gulzar Khan vs Commissioner Of Consolidation And Ors. on 7 May, 1993

3. Reference to the decisions in the aforesaid O. J. Cs. however, shows that this point had really not been directly examined, though some observations were made on the question under consideration. But then, this point had been the subject matter of a direct decision of this Court in (Maguni Pradhan v. Commissioner of Consolidation); 1992 (I) OLR 246, to which one of us (Jagadeb Roy, J.) was a party, in which the question at hand was answered affirmatively. We shall advert to this decision at the appropriate place.

Kasinath Misra And Ors. vs State Of Orissa And Ors. on 10 April, 1992

9. Making of an application by a -party is not contemplated Under Section 37. However, Such an application may provide the basis for initiation of action Under Section 37. The situations and circumstances where the power Under Section 37 can be exercised have been elaborately dealt with by this Court in Maguni Pradhan v. Commissioner of Consolidation, Oriasa and Ors.. 1992 (I) OLR 246 and M/.
Orissa High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Niranjan Satapathy & Others vs Benudhar Satapathy & Others ...... Opp. ... on 5 May, 2026

"4. Section 37 of the Consolidation Act bas conferred power and authority on the Consolidation Commissioner and the Director of Consolidation to call for and examine the records of any case decided or proceedings taken up by any subordinate authority and to rectify if the subordinate authority has committed any substantial illegality or infirmity This power is not controlled by any other provisions in the Act. The Statute has not put any 2 1999 (II) OLR 554 Page 11 of 20 limitation on this power so that this power can be exercised at any stage to prevent perpetration of any illegality and to promote the interest of justice. It is obvious that the power must be exercised to further the interest of justice and to prevent abuse of the process of law A Division Bench of this Court in Maguni Pradhan v. Commissioner of Consolidation, Orissa and others reported in 1992 (1) OLR 246 has already made the position clear.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Mishra - Full Document

Laxman Sahu And Ors. vs Director Of Consolidation And Anr. And ... on 27 January, 1999

4. Section 37 of the Consolidation Act has conferred power and authority on the Consolidation Commissioner and the Director of Consolidation to call for and examine the records of any case decided or proceedings taken up by any subordinate authority and to rectify if the subordinate authority has committed any substantial illegality or infirmity. This power is not controlled by any other provisions in the Act. The Statute has not put any limitation on this power so that this power can be exercised at any stage to prevent perpetration of any illegality and to promote, the interest of justice. It is obvious that the power must be exercised to further the interest of justice and to prevent abuse of the process of law. A Division Bench of this Court in Maguni Pradhan v. Commissioner of Consolidation, Orissa and Ors. reported in 1992 (I) OLR 246 has already made the position clear.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - P Ray - Full Document
1