Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 311 (6.42 seconds)
Documents citing All India Council For Technical Edu vs Surinder Kumar Dhawan & Ors on 18 February, 2009

Buddhabhushan Anand Londhe Another vs Union Of India & Ors. on 3 May, 2023

- 30 - Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:3121 regard to curricular admission process, career progression of their employees, matters of discipline or other general administrative issues concerning the institution or university. It was held by this court in All India Council for Technical Education v. Surinder Kumar Dhawan "16. The courts are neither equipped nor have the academic or technical background to substitute themselves in place of statutory professional technical bodies and take decisions in academic matters involving standards and quality of technical education. If the courts start entertaining petitions from individual institutions or students to permit courses of their choice, either for their convenience or to alleviate hardship or to provide better opportunities, or because they think that one course is equal to another, without realizing the repercussions on the field of technical education in general, it will lead to chaos in education and deterioration in standards of education."
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 3 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Devendra Singh Chaudhary vs Jawaharlal Nehru University And Ors on 7 December, 2023

18. A congruent view was taken by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of All India Council for Technical Education v. Surinder Kumar Dhawan, whereby, it was of the opinion that any intermeddling with decisions pertaining to the academic matters would lead to chaos in education and cause deterioration in standards of education. The relevant paragraphs of the said decision are reproduced as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Siby Mathews vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 8 December, 2020

In Surinder Kumar Dhawan's case (Supra), the Apex Court held that it is the function of AICTE to consider and grant approval for introduction of any new course or programme in consultation with the agencies concerned, and to lay down the norms and standards for any course including curricula, instructions, assessment and examinations and the courts are neither equipped nor have the academic or technical background to substitute themselves in place of statutory professional technical bodies and take decisions in academic matters involving standards and quality of technical education.
Karnataka High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S Govindaraj - Full Document

Saraswati Education Societys ... vs All India Council For Technical ... on 14 August, 2015

b) Order in Civil Appeal No.4349/2004 by Supreme Court dated 18/02/2009 by R.V. Raveendran J. - All India Council for Technical Education v. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (supra) - It is observed that without any prior statutory and/or affiliation or assessment, granting approval for a new course or programme by the Court by overlooking the expert body like AICTE's function, is unacceptable. The contentions are not in view of the earlier orders passed by this Court and the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Bombay High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 5 - A V Mohta - Full Document

C/M Karmyog Sewa Samiti Thru. Auth. ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. ... on 19 August, 2025

In All India Council for Technical Education v. Surinder Kumar Dhawan [(2009) 11 SCC 726], this Court, while stating the principles that the courts may not substitute their opinion in place of the opinion of the Council, held as under: (SCC pp. 732-33 & 736, paras 17-18 & 32) "17. The role of statutory expert bodies on education and the role of courts are well defined by a simple rule. If it is a question of educational policy or an issue involving academic matter, the courts keep their hands off.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next