Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing Bharat Steel Tubes vs State Of Bihar on 17 March, 1993

M/S. Triveni Adhesive Tapes vs Sh. Ramesh Jaina on 13 April, 2015

Fifthly the Ld. Arbitrator while considering the grounds so raised, has arrived at a just conclusion that on the basis of the bills not only which the petitioner has denied before this Court but also which he has admitted i.e. Bill No. RO17 dated 10.2.2007 for a sum of Rs.6,04,498/­ and Bill No. RO24 dated 20.2.2007 for Rs.6,06,578/­ containing the printed Arbitration Clause which has never been challenged by the petitioner previously. The Arbitration Clause has been printed in all the invoices against which the goods had been supplied and these bills had been signed by the petitioner in token of their acceptance and it was for this reason that the Ld. Arbitrator had rejected the plea of the appellant and hold that he had the jurisdiction. The objection raised by the petitioner/ objection has been put to rest by the observations made by the Delhi High Court in the case of Schjolar Pulishing House Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Khanna Traders reported in 2013 (3) Arb.LR 105 (Delhi) and in the case of Bharat Steel Tubes Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1993 Arb.LR 120.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1