Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P.& Others vs Tarkeshwar Nath Singh & Others on 23 March, 2015

Ranjana Devi And 10 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 20 June, 2022

"So far as claim of the petitioners are that they are entitled for the salary similar to the teachers of the High School and Intermediate College under 1978 Act is concerned, issue is no more res integra. It is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court referred hereinabove. Therefore, the view of learned Single Judge is liable to be affirmed. However, a question whether the petitioners in the writ petitions are validly appointed teachers, has not been adjudicated at any stage. Therefore, we direct the authority concerned to examine the appointment of the petitioners and in case appointments of the petitioners are found to be in accordance to the law, the salary may be paid and in case if the authority concerned may arrive to the conclusion after giving opportunity to the hearing to the petitioners that they are not legally appointed, a reasoned order may be passed in this regard and in such circumstances, the petitioners may not be entitled for the salary in accordance to the law laid down by the Court."
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Siddharth - Full Document

Smt.Kiran Mishra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 1 November, 2023

The case of the writ petitioner is that the fourth respondent-institution, namely Amar Sanskrit Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya,Kejuri, Ballia is in grant-in-aid till Primary Section. It is further the case of the writ petitioner that pursuant to the selection conducted therein, the writ petitioner was issued appointment as Assistant Teacher in Primary Section on 17.09.1999 and he was accorded joining on 22.9.1999. It is further the case of the writ petitioner that with regard to certain complaints being made with respect to the appointments being made, the same occasioned filing of writ petition before this Court and the same travelled before the Special Appellate Bench in Special Appeal No. 531 of 2005, State of U.P. Vs. Tarkeshwar Nath Singh and others, wherein certain orders were passed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prabhesh Kumar @ Pravesh Kumar And ... vs State Of Up And Another on 26 August, 2019

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 25.7.2019 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar whereby non bailable warrants have been issued against the applicants in Criminal Case No.3750 of 2018 (State vs. Tarkeshwar and others) arising out of Case Crime No.388 of 2018, u/s 147, 323, 504, 308 I.P.C., P.S.-Khalilabad, District-Sant Kabir Nagar.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K N Bajpayee - Full Document

Tarkeshwar And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 November, 2019

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 15.10.2019 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division-Ist, Gorakhpur whereby non bailable warrants have been issued against the applicants in Case No.1580 of 2002 (State vs. Tarkeshwar and others) arising out of Case Crime No.210 of 1999, u/s 323, 504, 324 I.P.C., P.S.-Gagha, District-Gorakhpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K N Bajpayee - Full Document

Smt. Kiran (Dubey) Mishra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 20 July, 2023

The case of the writ petitioner is that the fourth respondent-institution, namely Amar Sanskrit Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya,Kejuri, Ballia is in grant-in-aid till Primary Section. It is further the case of the writ petitioner that pursuant to the selection conducted therein, the writ petitioner was issued appointment as Assistant Teacher in Primary Section on 17.09.1999 and he was accorded joining on 22.9.1999. It is further the case of the writ petitioner that with regard to certain complaints being made with respect to the appointments being made, the same occasioned filing of writ petition before this Court and the same travelled before the Special Appellate Bench in Special Appeal No. 531 of 2005, State of U.P. Vs. Tarkeshwar Nath Singh and others, wherein certain orders were passed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Pavnesh Kumar Yadav And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 October, 2023

Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, District Inspector Schools, Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same, the second respondent shall put to notice the fourth respondent and decide the entitlement of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order bearing in mind the position of the sanctioned strength, vacancies, selection area adopted as per rules, import and impact of non grant of approval continuance as well as the applicability of the judgement in the case of Tarkeshwar Nath Singh (Supra) .
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anchal Yadav And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 October, 2023

Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, District Inspector Schools, Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same, the second respondent shall put to notice the fourth respondent and decide the entitlement of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order bearing in mind the position of the sanctioned strength, vacancies, selection area adopted as per rules, import and impact of non grant of approval continuance as well as the applicability of the judgement in the case of Tarkeshwar Nath Singh (Supra) .
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sweta Rai And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 26 October, 2023

Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, District Inspector Schools, Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same, the second respondent shall put to notice the fourth respondent and decide the entitlement of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order bearing in mind the position of the sanctioned strength, vacancies, selection area adopted as per rules, import and impact of non grant of approval continuance as well as the applicability of the judgement in the case of Tarkeshwar Nath Singh (Supra) as well as delay in approaching the court that too being inordinate and unexplained in the light of the judgment in the case of Rushaibai Jagdish vs. Bhavnagar Munispal Corporation JD 2022 (5) SC 470.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rashid Ali And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 1 November, 2023

8. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, District Inspector Schools, Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same, the second respondent shall put to notice the fourth respondent and decide the entitlement of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order bearing in mind the position of the sanctioned strength, vacancies, selection area adopted as per rules, import and impact of non grant of approval continuance as well as the applicability of the judgement in the case of Tarkeshwar Nath Singh (Supra) as well as delay in approaching the court that too being inordinate and unexplained in the light of the judgment in the case of Rushaibai Jagdish vs. Bhavnagar Munispal Corporation JT 2022 (5) SC 470.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Dular Yadav And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 8 November, 2023

8. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, District Inspector Schools, Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same, the second respondent shall put to notice the fourth respondent and decide the entitlement of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order bearing in mind the position of the sanctioned strength, vacancies, selection area adopted as per rules, import and impact of non grant of approval continuance as well as the applicability of the judgement in the case of Tarkeshwar Nath Singh (Supra) as well as delay in approaching the court that too being inordinate and unexplained in the light of the judgment in the case of Rushaibai Jagdish vs. Bhavnagar Munispal Corporation JD 2022 (5) SC 470.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next