Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Sudhir Kumar Alias Sudhir Singh Chauhan ... vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 5 December, 2019

Ramdev Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 13 September, 2022

17. Reverting to the facts of the present case in light of Section 31(1) of the CrPC and the principles of law laid down by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Sunil Kumar (supra), since the appellant has not been convicted for imprisonment for life and the learned trial Court has not directed to run the sentences concurrently, it is directed that sentences would run concurrently.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Agrawal - Full Document

Khuma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2022

09. The Apex Court again in the case of Sunil Kumar Alias Sudhir Kumar & Another v/s The State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2021) 5 SCC 560, in which the Apex Court has held that the Court of the first instance is under legal obligation while awarding multiple sentences to specify in clear terms as to whether they would run concurrently or consecutively. Once he is found guilty of any offence punishable under IPC or/and of an offence punishable under any other Special Act arising out of one trial or more. If the Court of the first instance is intending to the consecutive running of the sentence, there is yet another obligation on it to state the order (i.e. the sequence) in which they are to be executed and it is the duty of the High Court to examine this issue while hearing a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of conviction.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Durga Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ... on 25 July, 2022

Shri Manjeev Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has informed the Court that in pursuance of the direction of this Court dated 21st June, 2022, issued in Writ-C No.3631 of 2022 (Sudhir Kumar Singh and another Vs. State of U.P. & others), the proceedings are pending and the same shall be concluded expeditiously. Although the petitioner, for the compliance of such direction, has recourse open to the contempt proceedings, but in any case the direction issued by this Court ought to have been complied with by the competent authority.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - N K Johari - Full Document
1