Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Mr. Lachhman P. Udhani, Mr. Deepak L. ... vs Redington (India) Ltd., Represented By ... on 25 April, 2006

Bibek Raychaudhuri And Ors. vs Virama Enterprises Private Limited ... on 30 March, 2007

18. Mr. Nandy, as learned Counsel for the petitioner (in C.R.R. No. 419/04) referred to the decision in the case of Lachhman P. Udhani and Ors. v. Redington (India) Ltd. 2006(3) Crimes 731 in support of his contention that in a case where a certified copy of form 32 is filed by the accused to show that he had resigned from the post of Director prior to the issuance of cheque an challenge thereto is innocuous, Court has to accept it and relieve director from ordeal of trial.
Calcutta High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Mohd. Raju on 4 September, 2018

In a case reported as P.P. Vs. N.S. Murthy, 1973 Crl.L.J. 1238 (AP), it is well observed that the accused, a shopkeeper in a sudden quarrel hit his wife with an iron weight of 200 grams which resulted in her death. The medical evidence showed that the injury was of a simple nature and there was no evidence that the deceased died of shock caused by the injury. He was held liable only under Sec. 323 IPC and not under Sec. 304 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nand Kishore Sonthalia vs M/S.Religare Finvest Limited on 27 January, 2021

7. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that this Court while considering a quash petition can rely upon the defence document if it is unimpeachable and sterling in quality. Useful reference can be made in this regard to the judgment in the case of Lachhman P.Udhani and others Vs Redington (India) Ltd., rep. By Mr.V.S.N.Muthy, Senior Executive – Accounts, SPL, Guindy House, No.95, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai 32 reported in 2006 (4) CTC 43 and in the case of Anita Malhotra Vs Apparel Export Promotion Council and another reported in (2012) 1 SCC 520.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document

State vs Sonu @ Abhishek on 24 March, 2018

In a case reported as P.P. Vs. N.S. Murthy, 1973 Crl.L.J. 1238 (AP), it is well observed that the accused, a shopkeeper in a sudden quarrel hit his wife with an iron weight of 200 grams which resulted in her death. The medical evidence showed that the injury was of a simple nature and there was no evidence that the deceased died of shock caused by the injury. He was held liable only under Sec. 323 IPC and not under Sec. 304 IPC. In the case in hand, it is also clear from the record that injured sustained injuries only with a single blow of danda. Nature of injury is opined as "simple". Besdies the above, weapon of offence has also not been recovered or got recovered. Hence, in view of the observations made in the above reported case, court is of the view that present case falls within the ambit of Sec. 323 IPC only.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1