Sanam Alias Mange vs State Of U.P. on 29 July, 2025
7. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. It is submitted that the naming of the applicant in the present matter is by co-accused Sagar Rana who after arrest in his confessional statement has named the applicant as one of the accused. It is submitted that Sagar Rana has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.02.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5901 of 2020 (Sagar Rana Vs. State of U.P.). The said order has been placed before the Court which is at page-151 of the paper book. It is further submitted while placing the supplementary affidavit dated 21.11.2024 that the perusal of the statements of P.W.-1 Sanchit Verma, P.W.-2 Sanjay Verma and P.W.-3 Ravi Verma would go to show that there is no credible evidence against the applicant. It is submitted that no test identification parade was conducted in the present matter which would give credible evidence regarding the participation of the applicant in it. While placing paragraph number 31 of the affidavit in support of the bail application, it is submitted that initially it was disclosed that the applicant is involved in seven criminal cases and thus the same were disclosed and explained therein but after the filing of short counter affidavit on behalf of the first informant it was disclosed therein that the applicant is involved in 15 criminal cases including the present case and thus reply to all the said cases has been given as its explanation in paragraph-10 of the said rejoinder affidavit. It is submitted that the applicant is in jail since 07.11.2020 and the trial is still pending and thus he be granted bail. It is further submitted that co-accused Rohit @ Rohtash has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.06.2020 passed in Criminal Misc.