C. Munichowdappa vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 6 September, 1984
18. The next ruling relied on by Sri Subba Rao was Woollen Mill Kamdar Sangh, Jamnagar v. State of Gujarat and another [1977-II L.L.J. 353].
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)K. Ramaswamy vs Government Of Tamil Nadu And Anr. on 10 July, 1979
9. The validity of an order refusing to refer a dispute for adjudication was considered by a Bench of the Gujarat High Court in Kamdar Sangh v. State of Gujarat 1977 II L.L.J. 353. The petitioner-union in the writ proceedings in the High Court had sponsored the dispute relating to the discharge of a workman and the State Government had refused to make a reference. Earlier, the management, had sought approval of the Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b) of the discharge of the workman and it was granted subject to the condition that the workman was free to seek a reference for adjudication. The Acting Chief Justice speaking for the Bench observed as follows:
V. Veerarajan And Ors. vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu Reptd. By ... on 20 November, 1984
18. Even the decision in Kamdar Singh v. State of Gujarat (1977) 2 L.L.J.353; Workmen J and P Coats v. State of Kerala (1977) 2 L.L.J.534 and Venkatiah v. Government of India, Ministry of Labour (1978) 2 L.L.J.487 : (1978) Lab.I.C.135 had uniformly laid down that the government shall take into consideration all relevant considerations and should not be influenced by remarks which are not germane.
1