Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1223 (1.38 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Maharashtra Trhu Cbi vs Vikram Anantrai Doshi & Ors on 19 September, 2014

State vs Vikram on 12 April, 2024

30. Section 304B IPC is attracted only when the woman dies SC no. 456/2020 State Vs. Vikram FIR No. 353/2018, PS Palam Village Page 14 of 21 under unnatural circumstances. The postmortem report has been admitted by the accused under Section 294 Cr.PC and was exhibited as Ex.PX4. Since there was no dispute to the postmortem report, therefore, the same can be read as evidence. The said postmortem report was prepared by Dr. B. N. Mishra wherein the opinion on the cause of death was given as under :
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Mahesh @ Vikram, S/O Sh. Swami Deen, on 28 February, 2015

During cross examination he claimed that his thumb impression at point mark X on Ex.PW1/A was affixed in the Police Station and at that time besides himself his brother Rajesh, Sonu and his sister were present and signature of his sister and Sonu were obtained on some papers by the police. On 26.09.2010, he alongwith his sister and Jija remained in the Police Station for about 45 minutes and the police had obtained their signatures on some papers but his thumb impression was not obtained. He claimed that he knew the accused persons since his childhood but he can not tell the contents of Ex.PW1/C, though, it bears his signature at point Mark X. He had signed the same in the Police Station. He conceded that a State Vs. Mahesh & Vikram etc. (SC No.14/2013) Page No. 8 of pages 20 cross case was registered at PS Uttam Nagar in the year 2005 against him. He was not unconscious when he was being treated in DDU Hospital and on asking by the attending doctor he only told that he had been stabbed by Notty. In the hospital he was taken from the Police Station first and thereafter, his sister, chacha and others reached there subsequently. He could not tell the date of arrest of accused Vicky @ Govind and accused Vicky was previously known to him.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Title Of The Case: : State vs . Vikram on 16 May, 2023

19. Possibility of tampering: The testimony of PW1, PW2 and PW4 reflect that the case property i.e. one quarter bottle and the remaining case property was sealed with the seal of KK however, there is no handing over memo of the seal to suggest that the seal used for the seizure of the case property remained in possession of any independent person. PW4 correctly identified the case property and same was Ex. P-1 and at the time of production of case property, Digitally FIR No. 597/15 State vs. Vikram 7 / 12 signed by SANYA SANYA DALAL Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sc No: 462/21 State vs . Vikram & Others on 2 March, 2023

"I along with my family living at the above address and working in HR Department of HDFC, Judgment 2 of 10 SC No: 462/21 State Vs. Vikram & Others Gurugram. On 14.08.2020, at about 7.00 pm, I came to my home after getting savings done. At that time, Yashwant who is my neighbor was standing with his friends in front of my under construction house. I told Yashwant that why are you standing here and to go to your respective home. On this, he got angry and argued with me. Yashwant hit me on my head with kadaa worn by him. On hearing commotion, his father Vikram and uncle Kishan also came from their house with sticks and bricks in their hands and started beating me. Vikram was having sticks in his hands and Kishan was having bricks in his hands. At the same time, my father Devender Kumar and mother Sumitra also came to rescue but we all were beaten by them with sticks, bricks and kicks. On hearing commotion, when my brothers Deepak and Saurabh and friend Sonu Sharma also came to rescue, Vikram and Kishan called their other three associates and neighbors who were also armed with sticks and bricks and they all beaten us on our head due to which blood was oozing out from our heads. My father called at 100 number. Police came and took us to RTRM Hospital where we were treated. Legal action should be taken against all of them as they have made a deadly attack on us."
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Naresh vs State Of Haryana on 17 December, 2015

Learned trial Court while summoning the petitioner as additional accused has observed that petitioner has been attributed an injury with pistol on the foot of PW1 Kaptan Singh but the appreciation of medical evidence produced in the parallel challan in case State Vs. Vikram etc. cannot be appreciated at this stage to be corroborative nature or not. Whether the ocular version of Kaptan Singh is corroborated by the medical evidence or not, cannot be analyzed at this stage.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M M Bedi - Full Document

Ashok Kumar & Ors vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 10 January, 2025

In State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi [State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi, (2014) 15 SCC 29 : (2015) 4 SCC (Cri) 563], this Court has considered the decision in Narinder Singh case [Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466 : (2014) 3 SCC (Cri) 54], Dimpey Gujral v. State (UT of Chandigarh) [Dimpey Gujral v. State (UT of Chandigarh), (2013) 11 SCC 497 : (2012) 4 SCC (Cri) 35] and Gian Singh case [Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 : (2012) 4 SCC (Civ) 1188 : (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 160 : (2012) 2 SCC (L&S) 988] and has laid down the principles for making interference in such matters thus : (Vikram Anantrai Doshi case [State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi, (2014) 15 SCC 29 : (2015) 4 SCC (Cri) 563], SCC pp. 38-39 & 41-42, paras 18, 24 &
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next