Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 78 (0.63 seconds)
Documents citing Siriya @ Shri Lal vs State Of M.P on 13 May, 2008

Ahmed Khan vs State By Traffic Police on 7 January, 2021

In Siriya v. State of M.P. [(2008) 8 SCC 72 : (2008) 3 SCC (Cri) 422] it has been held as follows: (SCC pp. 75-76, para 13) "13. '7. ... Protection of society and stamping out criminal proclivity must be the 25 object of law which must be achieved by imposing appropriate sentence. Therefore, law as a cornerstone of the edifice of 'order' should meet the challenges confronting the society. Friedman in his Law in Changing Society stated that: 'State of criminal law continues to be--as it should be--a decisive reflection of social consciousness of society.' Therefore, in operating the sentencing system, law should adopt the corrective machinery or deterrence based on factual matrix. By deft modulation, sentencing process be stern where it should be, and tempered with mercy where it warrants to be.'
Karnataka High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Ram Prakash Alias Pappu Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 3 December, 2021

In Siriya alias Shri Lal v. State of M.P. (2008) 8 SCC 72, it has been held as follows: (SCC pp.75-76, para 13) "13. ''7. ... Protection of society and stamping out criminal proclivity must be the object of law which must be achieved by imposing appropriate sentence. Therefore, law as a cornerstone of the edifice of "order" should meet the challenges confronting the society. Friedman in his Law in Changing Society stated that: "State of criminal law continues to be - as it should be - a decisive reflection of social consciousness of society". Therefore, in operating the sentencing system, law should adopt the corrective machinery or the deterrence based on factual matrix. By deft modulation sentencing process be stern where it should be, and tempered with mercy where it warrants to be.' * "
Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 1 - K Thaker - Full Document

Bala Prasad Kurmi vs State Of U.P. on 27 November, 2021

In Siriya alias Shri Lal v. State of M.P. (2008) 8 SCC 72, it has been held as follows: (SCC pp.75-76, para 13) "13. ''7. ... Protection of society and stamping out criminal proclivity must be the object of law which must be achieved by imposing appropriate sentence. Therefore, law as a cornerstone of the edifice of "order" should meet the challenges confronting the society. Friedman in his Law in Changing Society stated that: "State of criminal law continues to be - as it should be - a decisive reflection of social consciousness of society". Therefore, in operating the sentencing system, law should adopt the corrective machinery or the deterrence based on factual matrix. By deft modulation sentencing process be stern where it should be, and tempered with mercy where it warrants to be.' * "
Allahabad High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - K Thaker - Full Document

St. vs Anup Kumar on 12 November, 2010

In 2008 X AD (S.C.) 645 in case titled as Siriya @ Shri Lal Vs State of Madhya Pradesh, it has been held that, "in operation of Sentencing System, law should adopt corrective machinery or the deterrence based on factual matrix facts and given circumstances in each case, the nature of the crime, in manner in which it was planned and committed, the motive for commission of the crime, the conduct of the accused, nature of weapons used and all other attending circumstances are relevant in award of sentence. Sympathy to impose inadequate sentence would do more harm to the justice system to undermine the public confidence in the efficacy in law. .......... In each case, there should be proper balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances on the basis of relevant circumstances in a dispassionate manner.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next