Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.00 seconds)
Documents citing Sikkim Manipal University vs Indira Gandhi National Open University on 26 June, 2015

Sikkim Manipal University vs Union Of India And Ors on 3 January, 2020

19. Following the above Judgment, Student Petitioners in WP(C) No.08 of 2015 approached the Court as the degrees issued by the Petitioner University was not recognised by the Governments of Denmark and Australia where they intended to pursue higher studies. The Single Bench of this Court observed that ".......... factual and legal aspects of this case are the very ones involved in WP(C) No.04 of 2013, in the matter of Sikkim Manipal University vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University and Others, .........." The Petitioners had undergone the courses during the period when the DEP of the Respondent No.4 University was being run under valid recognition of the UGC and the DEC. The case of the Petitioners, it was observed, would be fully covered by the decision in WP(C) No.4 of 2013. It was further observed in WP(C) No.08 of 2015 as follows;
Sikkim High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 3 - M M Rai - Full Document

Sh. Saurabhh Shukla vs Indira Gandhi National Open University ... on 27 September, 2023

11. Apart from the above, the interim order of stay dated 22-02-2013 that was directed to be continued by a subsequent order dated 07-11-2013, was later confirmed by order dated 13-04-2015 in CM Appl No.33 of 2015 arising out of WP(C) No.04 of 2013 in Sikkim Manipal University (supra). Therefore, as a natural corollary and by necessary implication, the degrees in respect of the students, who were admitted to the DEP of the Respondent No.4-University after the order of stay, one of whom appears to be the Petitioner No.4, shall also be protected.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Vineet Singh & Anr vs State Of Sikkim And Ors on 2 November, 2016

The Respondent No.3 consequently took necessary steps for the regular students, however, with regard to the Distance Education, the EIILMU was dealing with it itself and the legality of imparting Distance Education has been decided by the Division Bench of this High Court in WP(C) No.56 of 2015 8 Vineet Singh and Another vs. State of Sikkim and Others Sikkim Manipal University vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University and Others1. However, it is denied that the EIILMU was allowed to run Distance Courses without the prior approval of the competent Authority. It is averred that the UGC has forwarded a letter dated 04-09-2013 addressed to the State Government regarding the Courses being run by EIILMU without the approval of UGC and DEC. That, in view of the above grounds the Petition requires no consideration.
Sikkim High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M M Rai - Full Document

Ashoke Kumar Nandy vs Union Of India & Ors on 19 May, 2017

Similar argument was advanced in the case of Sikkim Manipal University vs Indira Gandhi Open University & others and as regards the said issue it was observed "in any case, the question of territorial jurisdiction of Universities in respect of DEP having now been settled by the Apex Court in the decisions discussed earlier, the proceedings in the Hon'ble Madras High Court will be of no consequence". Such finding was not interfered with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Special Leave Petition preferred by UGC challenging the direction of the Sikkim High Court towards protection of the degrees of the students who intervened and others similarly placed who passed out degree course from the Sikkim Manipal University through their study centre in Nepal. While dismissing the special leave petition the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed "insofar as the questions of law raised by the petitioner-University Grants Commission before the High Court were concerned, they have been decided in favour of the petitioner".
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 3 - T Chakraborty - Full Document
1