Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing State Of J&K; vs Vishal Kumar And Anr on 15 November, 2017

State vs Vishal Kumar on 8 January, 2024

It is pertinent to note that in total 8 witnesses had been FIR No. 259/14 PS Vivek Vihar titled as State v. Vishal Kumar & Ors. 3/ 10 cited by the Prosecution including one public witness i.e. the complainant Gulshed Ahmed. There is no other public witness cited by the Prosecution either to the incident of robbery or with respect to the recovery of the stolen article. Apart from the complainant all the remaining witnesses are either police witnesses or MLC witnesses.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Vishal Kumar on 3 April, 2025

15) Being guided by above-said case laws, it can be said that the search, seizure and recovery made by the above said police officials was in complete violation of State Vs. Vishal Kumar FIR No. 41/2021 U/s. 33/38 Delhi Excise Act 7/9 the well established principles of law and the same can be said to be illegal which create grave doubts on the prosecution's version of recovery of liquor from the possession of the accused from the spot and substantiates the defence version that the alleged recovery was planted upon the accused at the police station and that entire proceedings were recorded at the police station and not on the spot.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Vishal Kumar on 8 April, 2019

5. ARGUMENTS OF LD. APP FOR STATE AND ACCUSED:­ Ld APP for the State had argued that the prosecution has successfully proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Ld APP for the State had also argued that the factum of violation of the order of ACP concerned by accused has State Vs. Vishal Kr.; FIR No. 47/19; PS PN 3/5 been proved beyond reasonable doubt and therefore, accused is liable to be convicted in this case.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Kumar And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, ... on 11 December, 2023

Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusing the order of trial court dated12.07.2023 (Annexure No. 6) as also taking note of the observations made by Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgments, referred above, and the nature of dispute/crime, which is essentially matrimonial in nature, this Court is of the view that no purpose would be served in keeping the proceedings pending before the trial court and hence, the proceedings ofimpugned charge sheet (Annexure No. 3, summoning order dated 09.09.2022 (Annexure No. 4) as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 87902/2022 (State vs. Vishal Kumar and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 0009 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Lucknow pending before Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 50/F.T.C., Lucknow are hereby quashed in terms of the compromise.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Sushil Kumar Pandey And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 March, 2023

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 15.07.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 149412 of 2022, (State Vs. Vishal Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 444 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 354, 504, 506 & 509 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and under Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station- Lalpur / Pandeypur, District- Varanasi, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Kumar And Another vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another on 16 May, 2018

This criminal misc. application has been filed by the applicants to set-aside the summoning order dated 31.10.2017 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.11623 of 2017, "State vs. Vishal Kumar & another," under Section 420, 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V K Bist - Full Document

State vs Vishal Kumar @ Badal on 24 March, 2022

CRL.A. 114/2022 & Crl.M.A.5355/2022 (Delay) This appeal has been instituted under Section 377(1)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the impugned order on sentence dated 09.12.2019 passed by Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Additional Sessions Judge-3 (Shahdara), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Case FIR No. 156/2011 under Section 307/341/326/34 IPC Police Station: M.S. Park, titled as "State Vs. Vishal Kumar alias Badal in S.C.No. 224/2017.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - S Mridul - Full Document
1   2 Next