The Director vs Er. Manmohan Singh Kalsi And Others on 30 March, 2010
6. Only contention which has been put forward is that
if government servant earlier resigned from the previous
service, the benefit of the said service could not be given.
Learned counsel for the appellant is unable to show any such
pleading or argument before learned Single Judge. On the
other hand, it was categoric case of the petitioner that he
applied through proper channel and was selected by the
Electricity Board and in such a situation, past service had to be
counted. Judgments of this Court in Er. Inderjit Singh Bajwa
v. State of Punjab and others, CWP No.18855 of 2002,
decided on 22.2.2007 and S.C.Kapuria relied upon in the
impugned order have not been shown to be distinguishable.