Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.00 seconds)
Documents citing East India Transport Agency vs Swapan Kumar Paul on 5 August, 2015

Sh. Ram Phal vs Rca No. 12/2017 Page 1 Of 5 on 15 November, 2018

The   first   codified   statute   dealing   with   limitation came to be enacted in 1840. The Act 14 of 1840 in fact was an enactment applicable in England but it was   extended   to   the   territory   of   Indian   continent which was under the reign of East India Company, by an authority of Privy Council in the East India Company   v.   Oditchurn   Paul,   1849   (Cases   in   the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies) 43.
Delhi District Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi Pinjra Pole Society (Regd.) vs . Sharda Devi on 4 July, 2019

The first codified statute dealing with limitation came to be enacted in 1840. The Act 14 of 1840 in fact was an enactment applicable in England but it was extended to the territory of Indian con­ tinent which was under the reign of East India Company, by an authority of Privy Council in the East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul, 1849 (Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies) 43.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi Pinjra Pole Society (Regd.) vs . Govind Ram on 4 July, 2019

The first codified statute dealing with limitation came to be enacted in 1840. The Act 14 of 1840 in fact was an enactment applicable in England but it was extended to the territory of Indian con­ tinent which was under the reign of East India Company, by an authority of Privy Council in the East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul, 1849 (Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies) 43.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Govind Narain vs Sh. Vijender Singh @ Munna on 9 October, 2020

"21. The principle of adverse possession and its consequences wherever attracted has been recognized in the statute dealing with limitation. The first codified statute dealing with limitation came to be enacted in 1840. The Act 14 of 1840 in fact was an enactment applicable in England but it was extended to the territory of Indian continent which was under the reign of East India Company, by an authority of Privy Council in the East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul, 1849 (Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies) 43.
Delhi District Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Lala Ram vs Sh. Rajender Kumar on 22 October, 2020

"21. The principle of adverse possession and its consequences wherever attracted has been recognized in the statute dealing with limitation. The first codified statute dealing with limitation came to be enacted in 1840. The Act 14 of 1840 in fact was an enactment applicable in England but it was extended to the territory of Indian continent which was under the reign of East India Company, by an authority of Privy Council in the East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul, 1849 (Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies) 43.
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next