Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.70 seconds)

Kuldeep vs Comm. Of Police on 16 December, 2024

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kuldeep vs Comm. Of Police on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parvesh vs Comm. Of Police on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash vs Comm. Of Police on 16 December, 2024

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hanuman Singh Shekhawat vs Govt. Of Nctd on 16 December, 2024

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash vs Comm. Of Police on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hanuman Singh Shekhawat vs Govt. Of Nctd on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manish Kumar vs Comm. Of Police on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay vs Govt. Of Nctd on 8 November, 2023

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amit Kumar Verma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 July, 2025

7. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 08.05.2025 passed by District Magistrate, Ballia in Criminal Case no. 343 of 2025 (State vs. Amit Kumar Verma) (Computer Case no. D202515090000343), under Section 5(A) of U.P.Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, arising out of Case Crime no. 62 of 2025 under Section 3/5A/8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, and Section 11 of Animal Cruelty Act, PS- Sikanderpur, District Ballia, is hereby set-aside. The authority concerned is hereby directed to release the vehicle in shape of TATA Magic bearing no. UP60BT4816 in favour of its registered owner, i.e., applicant subject to deposition of entire market value of vehicle in question as surety before authority concerned before release, subject to following terms and conditions as mentioned below :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 3 Next