Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.92 seconds)
Documents citing Jagdish Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 25 March, 2022

Rakesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Munindra Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Sundar Lal Rawat vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Ram Dulare Prasad And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Sanjay Singh And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Manoj Kumar And 21 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 19 May, 2022

It is then contended that the aforesaid order dated 07.01.2022 passed by respondent-3 has already been upheld by this Court in Writ-A No.447 of 2022 (Jagdish Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). Judgement and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is squarely applicable in the present case. On the aforesaid premise, learned Standing Counsel contends that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document
1