Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.60 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sonia Mittal & Ors. on 12 October, 2017

Manish Garg & Anr vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr on 19 June, 2025

43. The reliance placed by the Insurance Company on judgment in the case of Mangla Goods Carrier v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra), in the opinion of this Court, is misplaced, inasmuch as the said judgment did not consider the earlier binding decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonia Mittal (supra), where as noted above, this Court held that the absence of endorsement on the license, despite the driver having the requisite certified training, would not amount to a disqualification or breach of policy conditions. The Court categorically held that securing such an endorsement was a ministerial act and the core requirement was possession of specialised training and knowledge.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hari Shankar (Dar) vs Ram Sewvak Prasad (335/22 Kk) on 2 September, 2025

43. The reliance placed by the Insurance Company on judgment in the case of Mangla Goods Carrier v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra), in the opinion of this Court, is misplaced, inasmuch as the said judgment did not consider the earlier binding decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonia Mittal (supra), where as noted above, this Court held that the absence of endorsement on the license, despite the driver having the requisite certified training, would not amount to a disqualification or breach of policy conditions. The Court categorically held that securing such an endorsement was a ministerial act and the core requirement was possession of specialised training and knowledge.
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amit Sharma vs New India Assurance Co. Pvt. Ltd And Ors on 16 May, 2025

(supra), in the opinion of this Court, is misplaced, inasmuch as the said judgment did not consider the earlier binding decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonia Mittal (supra), where as noted above, this Court held that the absence of endorsement on the license, despite the driver having the requisite certified training, would not amount to a disqualification or breach of policy conditions. The Court categorically held that securing such an endorsement was a ministerial act and the core requirement was possession of specialised training and knowledge.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nasreen Begum vs Anoop Kumar on 13 December, 2024

In view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Sonia Mittal (supra), since, the crucial requirement of the special training for driving a vehicle meant for transportation of hazardous goods has been fulfilled by respondent no.1 in the present case, the aforesaid plea on behalf of respondent no.3/insurance company on this count is not found sustainable.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jaldevi vs Ms Garg Roadlines on 13 December, 2024

In view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Sonia Mittal (supra), since, the crucial requirement of the special training for driving a vehicle meant for transportation of hazardous goods has been fulfilled by respondent no.1 in the present case, the aforesaid plea on behalf of respondent no.3/insurance company on this count is not found sustainable.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C. Malsawmsangi @ Mami vs . Yogesh on 19 December, 2022

Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in case National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sonia Mittal & Ors., MAC Appeal No. 1043/2016, decided on 12.10.2017 wherein it was held that "what is the crucial requirement is the special training for driving a vehicle meant for transportation of hazardous goods. That requirement has been fulfilled. Securing of endorsement in wake of such certification of the special skill was more of ministerial nature".
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hc Melki & Ors. vs . Yogesh Yadav & on 19 December, 2022

Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in case National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sonia Mittal & Ors., MAC Appeal No. 1043/2016, decided on 12.10.2017 wherein it was held that "what is the crucial requirement is the special training for driving a vehicle meant for transportation of hazardous goods. That requirement has been fulfilled. Securing of endorsement in wake of such certification of the special skill was more of ministerial nature".
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jawala Mukhi vs Arun Yadav on 18 July, 2024

13.3 In view of the evidence of R2W2, it is clear that the respondent no.1 had already received training qua safe transportation of hazardous goods from a authorized training centre for the same having validity covering the date of incident. The respondent no.1 certainly had no endorsement upon his driving license Ex. C1 qua same. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter titled as "National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sonia Mittal & Ors." MAC Appeal No. 1043/2016 decided on 12.10.2017 has held as under:-
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next