Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Aliveli Mallareddy vs Surthani Linganna , Chinna Linganna, on 21 July, 2023

Vamsi Krishna V Allias Vayakar Vamsi ... vs Sundar R on 23 April, 2026

32. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous injuries. The petition discloses that the petitioner was Software Engineer. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has SCCH-25 25 MVC No.3005/2024 & MVC No.3006/2024 5 held in a judgment/decision of ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lakshmidevamma vs Javali Dhanashekar on 3 December, 2025

34. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also SCCH-25 29 MVC No.1523/2024 & MVC No.1524/2024 evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained simple and grievous injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning/movements over the right shoulder and right hand. The petition discloses that the petitioner was RC owner and doing Driving work. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work and also squat on floor, climb upstairs. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of 4 ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narasimhulu G vs Javali Dhanashekar on 3 December, 2025

34. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also SCCH-25 29 MVC No.1523/2024 & MVC No.1524/2024 evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained simple and grievous injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning/movements over the right shoulder and right hand. The petition discloses that the petitioner was RC owner and doing Driving work. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work and also squat on floor, climb upstairs. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of 4 ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prakash V vs Sundar R on 23 April, 2026

32. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous injuries. The petition discloses that the petitioner was Software Engineer. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has SCCH-25 25 MVC No.3005/2024 & MVC No.3006/2024 5 held in a judgment/decision of ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prakash G M vs Bhusankar Reddy K on 19 November, 2025

18. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous SCCH-25 15 MVC No.4075/2024 injuries. And it certainly affected on movement of the right leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner was doing Agriculture and Milk vending work. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work and also squat on floor, climb upstairs. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of 1ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hari Prema Allias Prema vs Himansh Rusia on 20 November, 2025

31. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous and simple injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning over the left leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner is student and helping to his mother in day today activities. The evidence of the SCCH-25 25 MVC No.3543/2024 & MVC No.3544/2024 medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out that the petitioner is not required further treatment or follow up treatment and also implants should be remove. However the injuries affected to petitioner, certainly effects on his further education and also extra curriculum activities. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA 3 @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ranganatha N vs Himansh Rusia on 20 November, 2025

31. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous and simple injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning over the left leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner is student and helping to his mother in day today activities. The evidence of the SCCH-25 25 MVC No.3543/2024 & MVC No.3544/2024 medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out that the petitioner is not required further treatment or follow up treatment and also implants should be remove. However the injuries affected to petitioner, certainly effects on his further education and also extra curriculum activities. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA 3 @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramu R vs Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd on 22 November, 2025

20. By considering the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to SCCH-25 19 MVC No.750/2024 Court that, the petitioner has sustained simple and grievous injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning over the right leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner was doing Business as M/s Malnad Opticals (Self Employed). The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out the difficulties of the injured person to do routine work and also squat on floor, climb upstairs. It means, the petitioner is not in position to do the earlier work effectively. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of ALIVELI 3 MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shakunthala C R vs Girish H R on 1 December, 2025

39. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous and simple injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning over the left leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner is a Labor. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out that the petitioner is required further treatment or follow up treatment and also implants should be remove. However the injuries affected to petitioner, certainly effects on his day to day activities and also extra SCCH-25 31 MVC No.3893/2024, 3894/2024 & 3895/2024 curriculum activities. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of 7ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prithi C Y vs Girish H R on 1 December, 2025

39. By considering the dictums of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Our Hon'ble High Court and also evidence led by the medical officer, It is appears to Court that, the petitioner has sustained grievous and simple injuries. And it certainly affected on functioning over the left leg. The petition discloses that the petitioner is a Labor. The evidence of the medical officer clearly clinches that on clinical examination, the medical officer has pointed out that the petitioner is required further treatment or follow up treatment and also implants should be remove. However the injuries affected to petitioner, certainly effects on his day to day activities and also extra SCCH-25 31 MVC No.3893/2024, 3894/2024 & 3895/2024 curriculum activities. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held in a judgment/decision of 7ALIVELI MALLAREDDY Vs SURTHANI LINGANNA @ CHINNA LINGANNA & Others. in paragraph No.10 "This evidence has been dealt with by the High Court in extenso and having regard to the fact that the Almanco Manual would suggest that the disability when not assessed to the whole body, the disability to the lower limb will be 1/5 and upper limb be ¼ of the disability assessed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next