Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Mukundalal Pakrashi vs Prokash Chandra Pakrashi And Anr. on 24 May, 1939

Govind Prasad Agrawal vs Bhurelalji Agrawal And Ors. on 16 February, 1993

In this regard Mukundanlal Pakrashi v. Prokash Chandra Pakrashi, AIR 1939 Cal. at page 739, can also be referred to in which the facts were that the first award had not decided some of the matters referred to the arbitration, as the parties were not prepared with their statements. It was definitely stated in the first award that there will be a supplementary award and, in pursuance of the said reservation, the second award was given. Under the said circumstances, it was held that two awards taken together make a complete award disposing of the dispute referred to arbitration and the arbitrators cannot be said to be functus officio at the time when the second award was given.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - D M Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sh. Madan Lamba vs Shri Jagdish Lamba And Ors. on 3 September, 2002

25. Another concomitant objection Mr.Jain has raised is that since no Umpire was appointed before entering into reference as required under the Arbitration Act, arbitration proceedings are bad in law.In support of this contention, Mr.Jain has placed reliance upon Ram Kishore Vs.Raj Narain Dubey and others AIR 1963 Allahabad wherein it was held that in the absence of appointment of umpire which is mandatory provision of Schedule I of the Arbitration Act, 1940 the award is rendered invalid.
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - J D Kapoor - Full Document
1