Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Prem Nath Gupta And Another vs The State Of Haryana And Others on 25 November, 2010

Surendra Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 23 December, 2016

28. Section 11 of the Evidence Act prescribes that the other fact which are relevant to the facts in issue could be accepted whereunder plea of alibi is found engrafted. The principle to be followed up while appreciating the plea of alibi has been thoroughly discussed and reiterated in Jumni and others v. State of Haryana and Prem Nath and another v. State of Haryana reported in 2014 Cri.L.J. 1936, wherein it is has been held:-
Patna High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - A K Trivedi - Full Document

Shiva Textiles vs Krishna Sales Corporation on 28 September, 2018

23. The decisions in Jayantibhai Bhenkarbhai vs State of Gujarat - (2002) 8n SCC 165; Jumni vs State of Haryana and Prem Nath & Anr. Vs State of Haryana - 2014 CRLJ 1936 (SC); Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal vs Rashmi Aggarwal - III (2014) DMC 250 (All.); A. R. Antulay vs. R. S. Nayak - AIR 1984 SC 718 relied upon by the counsel for the accused in this regard are   also   not   applicable   in   the   facts   of   this   case   and   thus   cannot   be applied like a Euclid's theorem.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1