Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

Union Of India Through The General ... vs Rakesh Kumar on 9 December, 2024

4. Contending that he had not carried out any excessive cutting, erasing or using of fluid on the OMR Sheet and that, therefore, the cancellation of his candidature was illegal, the respondent approached the Tribunal by way of OA 289/2017 (Rakesh Kumar v General Manager, Northern Railway), praying that the afore-extracted undated decision of the RRC, cancelling his candidature, be quashed and that he be appointed to the appropriate Group D post. Consequential benefits were also sought. Among other contentions, the respondent submitted that cancellation of his candidature, without issuing him any show cause notice, was violative of the law.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Dhani Ram vs General Manager N C Rly on 27 November, 2025

In O.A. No./289/2017 (Rakesh Kumar vs. General Manager Northern Railway and ors.) decided on 10.11.2023, the Principal Bench of this Tribunal, taking parity with other similar cases, had quashed the impugned order that cancelled the candidature of the applicant on the ground of violating an instruction in the OMR sheet as per which the bubble once darkened was not allowed to be erased with a blade or fluid.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1