Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... vs Abhinav Pandey & Ors. on 16 October, 2018

Heera Lal vs Expenditure on 25 May, 2023

In the case of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs. Abhinav Pandey & Ors., (supra), the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has observed that where a student due to medical reasons could not appear in an examination on the first available opportunity, cannot be used to his detriment or in any manner to penalize him. Further, the Hon'ble High Court has observed that they have no hesitation in arriving at the conclusion that the respondent no. 1 therein having been prevented due to unavoidable medical concerns from appearing in the subject papers in the first instance, during the Sixth End Semester Examinations, he ought not to be penalized or deprived of the fruits of his labour and well-deserved merit.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Heera Lal vs Expenditure on 25 May, 2023

In the case of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs. Abhinav Pandey & Ors., (supra), the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has observed that where a student due to medical reasons could not appear in an examination on the first available opportunity, cannot be used to his detriment or in any manner to penalize him. Further, the Hon'ble High Court has observed that they have no hesitation in arriving at the conclusion that the respondent no. 1 therein having been prevented due to unavoidable medical concerns from appearing in the subject papers in the first instance, during the Sixth End Semester Examinations, he ought not to be penalized or deprived of the fruits of his labour and well-deserved merit.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Suthakar vs The Controller Of Examinations on 21 January, 2026

Even today, no definition in any of the Regulations and Circular of the University is placed on record. Therefore, it only remains on the interpretation of the term https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 04:13:07 pm ) W.P.No.49495 of 2025 ‘attempt’. The term ‘attempt’ has to be interpreted, according to the context. When the judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univeristy v. Abhinav Pandey and others (cited supra) has interpreted the word ‘attempt’ not to mean an absence, I am of the view that in the present context, where two views are possible, a view can be taken so as to further the cause of education of the concerned student, only as an exceptional case in the particular facts and circumstances of the instant case.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document
1