Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Rampyari Surajbali Since Decd. By Her ... vs K.C. Borkar And Anr. on 1 November, 1985

Goregaon Malayalee Samaj (Regd.) vs Popatlal Prabhudas And Sons And Ors. on 10 August, 1987

Mangharam Chuburmal v. B.C. Patel, 73 Bom.L.R. Page 140. at Page149; Santinath J. Upadhya v. Ajit Upadhya, and Mrs. Rampyari Surajbali v. K.V. Borkar, 1986 Bom.C.R p. 261. in this view of matter it must be held in fact of the present case that though the premises in its existing form are not land but consist of a structure put up by the original tenant V.O. Michael who in turn inducted the petitioners therein, the provisions of section 13(1)(i) would still be applicable as the premises let are land.
Bombay High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shri Abdulraheman @ Iqbal Faljukhan ... vs Sou. Kamalaben Mohanlal Shah on 3 March, 1999

8. He also cited a decision of this Court in Mrs. Rampyari Surajbali and others v. K. V. Borkar and another, reported in 1986 Mah. Rent Cases Journal 155. In fact this decision had hardly any application on the facts of this case. The main thrust of the said judgement is that section 13(1) apply only in respect of lease relating to open land. I do not think the decision will be of any help to fortify the contention raised by Mr. Patil.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - T K Das - Full Document
1